Commentary

Chris Murphy
Editor, InformationWeek  

When Did H-1Bs Become The Noncontroversial Immigration Issue?

Sitting next to the debate about widespread immigration reform, expanding the number of H-1B visas available suddenly doesn't seem too hot to handle.

Sitting next to the debate about widespread immigration reform, expanding the number of H-1B visas available suddenly doesn't seem too hot to handle.I know that's not the view on this blog based on past debates. But clearly this has a better chance of being changed if hived off from the widespread reforms, and one lawmaker proposed just that this week. So H-1B could be decided as its own issue. To decide whether to raise the cap, lawmakers have to pick one of two realities:

Raise the cap: The U.S. isn't producing enough technical grads, and the shortage threatens U.S. tech competitiveness and could force companies to move work abroad. U.S. companies can't find the people they need to keep work here.


More Global CIO Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Keep the cap: Many IT pros remain out of work, and H-1Bs are paid below the going wage, even if the rules say they can't be. U.S. companies aren't willing to pay people what they're worth, so they can't find enough people.

My guess is that with IT unemployment stats coming in below 3%, the threat to U.S. competitiveness is going to feel more imminent to lawmakers than IT unemployment. They already bumped it up last year by 20,000 for foreign-born workers with U.S. degrees. The IT economy doesn't feel so great to anyone whose job is directly threatened by offshoring. But it's looking like H-1B opponents will be hard-pressed to keep this cap at 65,000.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links