The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits



Topics:   Systems Management

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

IM: A Poor Fit For The Enterprise?


Posted by Amy Larsen DeCarlo, Jun 27, 2006 11:05 AM

In the get-it-done-yesterday world we live and work in, instant messaging may sound like the perfect enterprise communications tool. After all, speed rules these days. Yet in spite of an enterprise push by the biggest IM platform providers, a lot companies are resisting the urge to dive in head first into deploying instant messaging as a corporate application.


The most obvious reason for the hesitation is the very real security concern. As popular as instant messaging is as a consumer application, it has also proving to be popular with hackers who use it to transport viruses. Businesses are also mindful that the casual nature of IM may encourage employees to impulsively distribute confidential corporate information to people outside the company.

Some IT administrators say the real reason they aren't jumping on the IT bandwagon isn't security-related at all. Instead, a vocal contingent of systems administrators say their simply is no real driving need in their organizations for a corporate-wide IM application. Some who have deployed enterprise IM versions say end users found the packages difficult to use.

Personally, I am not the world's biggest IM fan however, for some purposes it can be an ideal application. For example, it can be a nice departmental communications tool. I would bet whether an organization sanctions IM as an enterprise tool, it is probably being widely used on a departmental or location basis.

Does your company have an official policy about IM use? If not, there is no time like the present to establish one.

« Daily News Podcast for Tuesday, June 27 | Main | Intel Cell Phone Effort A Failure Of Historic Proportions »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Think Parallel 2010, Five Years of Multicore
  2. It's All In the Strategy, It's All About the Design
  3. How To Do Parallelism Without Getting Egg On Your Face


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


  1. More Anti-Virus Fail
  2. Windows 7 Is Really That Good
  3. iPhone OS 4.0 Reported To Feature Multitasking


  1. FCC Broadband Plan Ready For Congress
  2. Bacteria Trail Betrays Identity Of Computer Users
  3. AT&T Adds Web Services For Feature Phones
  4. Congress Targeting Defense IT Acquisition Reform
  5. Progress Releases Real Time BPM Suite
  6. Windows Phone 7 Gets Motion Controller

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007