Commentary

InformationWeek
InformationWeek  

Is Dell In Serious Trouble?

Will this first week of June 2006 serve as a tipping point in the future history of Dell, one of the great American success stories that has found itself uncharacteristically battling uncertainty for the past several quarters as it has announced unspectacular earnings reports? Can Dell use the announcements of a new line of servers it made this week--and even more dramatic changes to its portfolio that are waiting in the wings--to reignite its engines? Or are the current difficulties simply the start of a long fall from the top of the technology mountain?

Will this first week of June 2006 serve as a tipping point in the future history of Dell, one of the great American success stories that has found itself uncharacteristically battling uncertainty for the past several quarters as it has announced unspectacular earnings reports? Can Dell use the announcements of a new line of servers it made this week--and even more dramatic changes to its portfolio that are waiting in the wings--to reignite its engines? Or are the current difficulties simply the start of a long fall from the top of the technology mountain?Illuminata analyst Gordon Haff points out that many businesses would "like to have some of the same financial issues" that Dell is currently facing. Dell hasn't announced multimillion-dollar losses. There have been no massive layoffs. The Dell stock hasn't fallen to a Sun Microsystems $4-a-share status. But for a company whose "Dell Effect" has defined the computing industry for the past decade, the 6% drop in sequential revenue in its fiscal first quarter ending May 5, and 23% drop in earnings, has raised a lot of questions.

Dell can no longer define itself as simply the provider of the lowest-cost, quality x86 servers on the market. Its competitors have made significant improvements in their own manufacturing supply chains and processes, which have resulted in more competition in the high-volume, low-price arena that Dell has ruled for so long.


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

The new servers will be based on Intel's latest Woodcrest platform that uses the company's newest dual-core processors based on its Core architecture. Intel and Dell say Core will allow dramatically increased performance while also improving power efficiency. Those are the dynamics that Advanced Micro Devices has been using so effectively over the past two years to eat away at the market that Intel has so long dominated.

How big an impact has Dell's strict allegiance to Intel had on its recent problems? While Sun has used new systems based on Advanced Micro Device's Opteron processors to build a completely new business, and Hewlett-Packard and IBM have given their customers a choice between AMD and Intel, Dell clung to its long-term ally even as AMD steadily increased its share of the x86 server market.

It may have been AMD's success in the four-way server space that finally convinced Dell to pull the trigger. According to research firm Gartner, AMD now owns 48% of the U.S. market in the four-way segment, and 36% of the worldwide market. Sometime later this year, Dell will be adding its own Opteron-based servers to the mix, most likely to address the four-way segment. And the question remains if the AMD flirtation will be a one-trick pony, or if Dell will begin filtering the alternative processor throughout its portfolio.

There are some signs that this isn't a case of too little too late for Dell. This week word leaked that Dell had secured a potentially major win with the technology company that has been garnering the kinds of headlines that Dell used to enjoy. Dell will supply its new servers to Google for use in the Internet giant's Search Appliance systems that it sells to enterprises. That deal alone could easily total in the tens of thousands of systems.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links