The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Microsoft

Topics:   Microsoft

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Vista Volume Licensing May Require Product Activation


Posted by , Jun 28, 2006 10:02 AM

According to CRN, Microsoft is planning to require Vista and Longhorn customers with volume licenses to register and report their license key usage, ostensibly through some kind of licensing server running on Longhorn, and possibly a hosted server run by Microsoft. Although the article does not explicity state that product activation will be required, it seems pretty clear that de-activation will occur if there is a problem with the supplied license key, which is likely to have the same basic results (ie, calling Microsoft and having them turn your PCs back on).


Currently, Microsoft uses an explicit product activation process for the OEM and retail versions of Windows XP, but volume licenses are exempted from this process. If some kind of activation or de-activation becomes automated, expect to go through the same kind of hassles sooner or later.

Activation under XP is tedious and error-prone when it is used frequently (trust me on this--Microsoft gives product testers retail license keys, and I have to go through this process all the time). First you have to enter the key, then the registration wizard automatically detects that the key has already been used, and the system starts counting down to automatic deactivation. Then you have to dial a phone number and provide the key to a computerized system all over again, only to be told that the key has already been used (again). At that point you are handed to a call center in India, where you finally get to talk to a human, who may or may not believe your reason for reactivating under the same key. If things go badly, you may have to repeate the entire process just to get a different human who will choose to cooperate. At best, it takes about half an hour to complete this process. If something similar happens under Vista volume licenses, I see no reason to expect that it would take less time.

Indeed, product activation is such a pain that Microsoft exempted large-scale buyers from the process entirely, and if you have a volume license key there is no activation required. Of course, software pirates have long since figured this out too, and volume licensing keys are often posted to various file-sharing systems for people to use with unlicensed copies of XP (why try to hack the activation process if you can just steal a license key that essentially does the job for you?).

From all outward signs, Microsoft is looking to bring an end to that practice. On the surface, this shouldn't work out too bad: if you have a valid volume agreement with enough licenses for all your systems, the automatic registration and enrollment should be fairly transparent. But it's what we don't know that frightens me here. Will hardware changes force a reregistration, like under XP now? How will dead activations be purged from the license server? Will there be a grace window for overlapping activations. If I replace my 500 desktops with 500 laptops, what will the licensing server think about it? How much extra time do I need to budget for installation due to this process?

Most important, will my company shutdown when the workers' PCs de-license themselves?

Obviously, these are things that IT management need to be concerned with. I'm sure that Microsoft has already considered most of this stuff and reached what they consider to be customer-appropriate solutions. However, they have different objectives than we do, so IT folks need to start thinking about this issue too, and reaching your own conclusions about acceptable behavior.

« Go Ahead. Kill Your Scanner! | Main | Keybored? Here's Two New Ways To Enter Data »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Sequential Programming: Like Eating Peas with a Straw.
  2. Biomolecular device using self-assembled DNA nanostructures?
  3. Coreinfo v2.0: A Simple Utility to Understand the Manycore Complexity in Windows


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. More Reasons Why Linux Misses The Desktop
  2. Too Much Netbook For Too Litl?
  3. Verizon: $350 ETF Is A Go
  4. Motorola Explains Why Droid Doesn't Have Multi-Touch


  1. Florida Hospital Dials Up iPhones For Nurses
  2. Full Nelson: A Web Presence Needs Sizzle, My Nizzle
  3. Is Antivirus Software Dead?
  4. Practical Analysis: The Fastest-Growing Security Threat
  5. InformationWeek Analytics Research: Federated Search
  6. Securing The Cyber Supply Chain

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007