Commentary

Marianne Kolbasuk McGee
Senior Writer, InformationWeek  

Group Wants U.S. Gov. To Reveal Who's Asking For H-1B Workers Now

Should the U.S. Dept. of Labor provide public access to a government database that purportedly contains information about employers planning to hire H-1B workers for fiscal 2007, which starts on Oct. 1, 2006? Kim Berry, president of advocate group Programmers Guild, says he wants U.S. tech workers to have the chance to more fairly compete for jobs that might otherwise go to foreigners. U.S. workers should have the opportunity right now to look at requests employers have made to the DOL to fill IT positions with H-1B visa holders--before the foreign workers can legally begin the jobs starting on Oct. 1, says Berry. If American workers can check out which employers are hiring for which jobs and at what wages, well, then maybe some interested (or out-of-work) American techies will have a shot to apply for those jobs before they're filled by foreigners.

Should the U.S. Dept. of Labor provide public access to a government database that purportedly contains information about employers planning to hire H-1B workers for fiscal 2007, which starts on Oct. 1, 2006?

Kim Berry, president of advocate group Programmers Guild, says he wants U.S. tech workers to have the chance to more fairly compete for jobs that might otherwise go to foreigners.


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

U.S. workers should have the opportunity right now to look at requests employers have made to the DOL to fill IT positions with H-1B visa holders--before the foreign workers can legally begin the jobs starting on Oct. 1, says Berry.

If American workers can check out which employers are hiring for which jobs and at what wages, well, then maybe some interested (or out-of-work) American techies will have a shot to apply for those jobs before they're filled by foreigners."If we see that, for example, HP is hiring 40 software engineers at a reasonable salary, then U.S. workers in that area can follow up regarding those openings," says Berry.

Berry this week faxed and e-mailed a letter to Bill Carlson, a DOL official, requesting that the U.S. government provide public access to information about Labor Conditions Applications regarding requests for H-1B visas for fiscal 2007.

Berry says the LCA database contains info about employers that are being granted permission by the DOL to hire H-1B workers in fiscal 2007.

The DOL typically provides access to prior years' LCA data, but not information for the upcoming fiscal year.

Berry says the DOL told him that data for fiscal 2007 doesn't yet exist, that the latest info the department has goes back to fiscal 2005--and that even fiscal 2006 won't be available till January.

Berry says he doesn't believe that information about H-1B requests for fiscal 2007 doesn't yet exist in a database--the Labor Conditions Application info has to go somewhere once an employer hits the "submit" button on its request, he says.

Indeed LCA information about employer requests for fiscal 2007 does exist somewhere. However, there's "lag time" in making this data available to the public, says a spokesman from the DOL, who returned InformationWeek's phone calls to Carlson after this blog was originally posted on July 19.

The lag time, which is usually at least three months, includes time for the DOL to "scrub" the data and ensure privacy. That scrubbing includes removing Social Security numbers and employer tax ID info, says the spokesman. Just as it takes time for the DOL to compile its unemployment figures every month before they're released, so too does it take time to compile LCA data to make it accessible to the public, he says.

Besides, under government regulations, employers are the ones that are supposed to be informing the public of intent to hire foreign workers--not the DOL, he says. Employers are supposed to inform the public 30 days preceding the date when the LCA--or request for H-1B workers--is submitted to the DOL. Postings can be done in one of two ways--hard copy in a "conspicuous" location, or electronically, which means e-mail or posting on e-bulletin boards or home Web pages--whichever way an employer "normally" communicates with employees. But in Berry's letter to Carlson, Berry writes, "since disclosure of the fiscal 2007 LCA database now could provide U.S. workers with a wealth of information about job opportunities, declining to release this public data now appears to violate the fundamental purpose of your division--to protect U.S. workers."

Employers on April 1 were able to begin submitting H-1B petitions for fiscal 2007. But by June 1, the U.S. government had already received enough petitions to meet the congressionally mandated cap of 65,000 H-1B for fiscal 2007.

But even if the DOL were to provide access to its LCAs for fiscal 2007, Berry acknowledges that many of those employers have already made commitments to hire specific foreign workers in jobs starting Oct. 1 or sometime afterward.

Also, "many H-1B employers are body shops that hire almost exclusively H-1B because that is the nature of their business," so American tech pros wouldn't have a shot at those jobs anyway, says Berry.

What do you think about all this? Think it would matter much if the DOL made its LCA data available to the public faster?

Or do you think it's up to the American tech worker to do the legwork, like checking out public job sites or company "job pages" to see who's hiring?

Let us know what you think about all this.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links