Commentary

Paul McDougall
Editor At Large, InformationWeek  

Linux Users Beware: SCO's Still Got You In Its Sights

In Monday's issue of InformationWeek, I take a closer look at the latest turns in SCO's quixotic court fight against IBM. To get you through the weekend, here's a critical tidbit you need to know about now if you're a Linux user, or if you're even thinking about using Linux.

In Monday's issue of InformationWeek, I take a closer look at the latest turns in SCO's quixotic court fight against IBM. To get you through the weekend, here's a critical tidbit you need to know about now if you're a Linux user, or if you're even thinking about using Linux.An online newsflash I wrote last week about the case quotes ubiquitous IT analyst Rob Enderle as saying Linux users could "breathe easier" after a judge threw out most of SCO's claims against IBM.

We got some feedback accusing InformationWeek, and Rob, of scaremongering. Apparently, many readers believe SCO is no longer interested in chasing down individual Linux users as it seeks to enforce what it claims is its rights to parts of the code. One chastised me for "speculating" that SCO ever really posed a threat to Linux users.


More Windows Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Speculating? SCO sued Linux-using companies DaimlerChrysler and AutoZone over the issue in 2004. That after SCO CEO Darl McBride published a windy open letter citing everyone from James Madison to former Chief Justice William Rehnquist in his effort to defend the company's litigious ways. To the point: An SCO PR rep I spoke to yesterday told me there has been "no change" to the company's position on the matter since that letter was published in 2003. That SCO hasn't sued more Linux users in the interim is likely mostly to do with the fact that its legal fight with IBM has it stretched thin. IBM won a big victory last week, but the case isn't over. Pay attention, and let us know if SCO has you worried.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links