Powered by InformationWeek Business Technology Network
Topics:
Google
Bodacious Web 2.0 Interactive Timeline, Thoughts About Web 2.0
Tomorrow kicks off the Web 2.0 Conference in San Francisco, co-sponsored by O'Reilly Media and the parent company of this blog, CMP Media. As a journalist, I get hives when people sling around marketing buzzwords, and "Web 2.0" is in danger of becoming a meaningless buzzword. But it seems to me that it has not reached that point, at least not yet. Web 2.0 is a useful phrase, describing a whole pack of design and business principles that go into the best Web sites and Web applications today. The key characteristic, I think, is that Web 2.0 sites are built in collaboration with users. Flickr and YouTube are collections of photos and videos created, uploaded and managed by users. The content on those sites is owned by the users, and, in effect, loaned to the sites in exchange for the services those sites provide in managing the content. Web 2.0 applications often have some other characteristics, most notably use of technologies such as RSS and Ajax. But those characteristics aren't essential to Web 2.0 the way user collaboration is. What do you think? Is Web 2.0 a real trend, or just a marketing buzzword? « Check Out The Windows Live Mail Client | Main | Are iPod Users Better People? » |
| Sign Up Now For InformationWeek News Alerts |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Ars Technica
Boing Boing Channel 9 Forums CRN Blogs Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs Engadget Gizmodo GrokLaw |
Lifehacker
Schneier on Security Slashdot TechCrunch Techdirt Techmeme Valleywag |