Commentary

Mitch Wagner
Executive Editor, Community  

Gingrich: Government Needs To Limit Free Speech

WCSH6 in Portland, Maine: "Gingrich Says Government May Have To Limit Speech In Terror War: Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich used a New Hampshire event dedicated to freedom of speech to say the United States will have to re-examine that constitutional right as it fights terrorism." He reportedly singled out the Internet as a channel that needs "a different set of rules."

This story has been making the rounds of the Internet, I've seen it in a couple of places. I sure hope Gingrich is being misquoted or quoted out of context here, because if he actually means this, it shows a shocking disregard for fundamental American values.

Does anybody reading this know if this is what Gingrich actually said?

Update: Eric Hall points me to www.newt.org, which has a transcript of the relevant portion of Gingrich's speech. It appears that Gingrich was, indeed, quoted accurately and in context.

So let's say we revoke free-speech protection for terrorists and their supporters. Who decides who's a terrorist? That's the danger of censorship, it's too tempting for government to use it to stifle dissent, disagreement, and unpopular opinion. Censorship simply swaps the threat of terrorism for government oppression.

There are already laws against speech which incites to violence, those are sufficient.

And if the terrorists are planning attacks, we want them to do it on the Internet, in the open, where we have a better chance of keeping an eye on them.

WCSH6 in Portland, Maine: "Gingrich Says Government May Have To Limit Speech In Terror War: Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich used a New Hampshire event dedicated to freedom of speech to say the United States will have to re-examine that constitutional right as it fights terrorism." He reportedly singled out the Internet as a channel that needs "a different set of rules."


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

This story has been making the rounds of the Internet, I've seen it in a couple of places. I sure hope Gingrich is being misquoted or quoted out of context here, because if he actually means this, it shows a shocking disregard for fundamental American values.

Does anybody reading this know if this is what Gingrich actually said?

Update: Eric Hall points me to www.newt.org, which has a transcript of the relevant portion of Gingrich's speech. It appears that Gingrich was, indeed, quoted accurately and in context.

So let's say we revoke free-speech protection for terrorists and their supporters. Who decides who's a terrorist? That's the danger of censorship, it's too tempting for government to use it to stifle dissent, disagreement, and unpopular opinion. Censorship simply swaps the threat of terrorism for government oppression.

There are already laws against speech which incites to violence, those are sufficient.

And if the terrorists are planning attacks, we want them to do it on the Internet, in the open, where we have a better chance of keeping an eye on them.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links