Commentary

John Foley
Editor, InformationWeek  

Microsoft's Linux Support: Denial, Then Concession

Microsoft and Novell have reached a pact to improve the way that Windows and Linux work together. Where were these guys three years ago when Bill Gates took me to task for asking whether Microsoft might do more in that area? "Tell me any area we're not doing enough," Microsoft's chairman huffed in November 2003 during a one-on-one interview in Las Vegas. "I mean, seriously, what area do you think we could do more in?" Thank you, Steve Ballmer, for coming up with an answer, albeit three years after that tongue lashing from your friend and colleague.

Microsoft and Novell have reached a pact to improve the way that Windows and Linux work together. Where were these guys three years ago when Bill Gates took me to task for asking whether Microsoft might do more in that area? "Tell me any area we're not doing enough," Microsoft's chairman huffed in November 2003 during a one-on-one interview in Las Vegas. "I mean, seriously, what area do you think we could do more in?" Thank you, Steve Ballmer, for coming up with an answer, albeit three years after that tongue lashing from your friend and colleague.Bill Gates would have none of my nonsense when I pointed out to him that InformationWeek, in a story at the time, had questioned whether Microsoft was doing enough to support compatibility between Linux and Windows. "Do you think Microsoft is doing more than people realize?" I asked him during our interview. "Will there be more?"

Those could have been softball questions, a chance for Gates to impress the world with Microsoft's plans to support computing environments where Windows and Linux coexisted, since that was, and continues to be, the reality for many customers. Instead, Gates challenged my line of questioning: "Tell me one area we're not doing enough," he said. And, "I don't know what you mean." And, "Name a corporate customer who has some interoperability thing they want from us." Here's the complete transcript of that interview.


More Windows Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

The issue of Windows-Linux interoperability is one InformationWeek has raised with Microsoft on several occasions. In February 2005, after Gates issued a written briefing to Microsoft customers on the subject of interoperability, I suggested Microsoft hadn't gone far enough. See "What Bill Gates Didn't Say About Interoperability."

All this came back to me last week when Steve Ballmer set the record straight. In describing Microsoft's deal with Novell to collaborate on virtualization, management, and document compatibility, he said: "This is a set of agreements that really I think will greatly enhance interoperability between Linux and Windows, and give customers greater flexibility in ways that they have certainly been asking for."

Novell brought along Randy Cohen, CTO of Goldman Sachs, a user of Windows, Linux, and Unix systems. "Until now, the burden of ensuring all that operates seamlessly and interoperates cleanly and well for us was really borne by us, at the enterprise customer side," Cohen said. "And it was a significant effort that we had to put into that."

So Microsoft has come clean on the need for Windows-Linux interoperability, acknowledging it's partly Microsoft's problem to solve. But that doesn't settle the matter. While the Microsoft-Novell agreement covers Suse Linux, there are other Linux distributions that would benefit from Microsoft's help and cooperation. Gates is no longer Microsoft's chief software architect, as he was at the time of that 2003 interview. We have some questions for Ray Ozzie the next time we see him.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links