The InformationWeek -- Blogs


Topics:  

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

It's All Unified, Or Is It


Posted by J. Nicholas Hoover, Dec 14, 2006 11:52 AM

A food services company that integrated click-to-call into its ERP program. A bank centralizing call centers from 94 to one. A hospital whose nurses carry wireless phones that run location-based applications. Abducted child alerts being automatically text messaged to cell phones. None of those sounds like unified communications to me, yet Cisco Systems cited every single one of them at it's annual analyst conference yesterday.

In fact, Cisco seems to put all IP communications under the unified communications moniker. During a session on the topic, Rick Moran, Cisco's VP of product and technology marketing for IP communications said there was potentially a $34 billion market in unified communications, but the slide he showed representing market potential included things like IP PBXes.

Unless I've been wrong for a year, the definition – the one we've been using in the magazine, as well as how analysts and consultants describe it to me – is that unified communications is an application (and the supporting hardware) that combines voice, video, instant messaging and often some sort of conferencing into a presence-enabled, integrated user interface. And for the vision of ceaseless collaboration to actually follow through, this capability needs to be combined with click-to-call in workflow processes and interoperable with other communication tools.

Cisco's muddying the waters a bit by describing all IP communications as unified communications. They’re not. At its base, VoIP is still a phone with the potential to tie in applications, chat is chat, videoconferencing is videoconferencing, presence is presence. It takes all those elements tied together to make unified communications happen. Not that Cisco doesn't have a vision for that. It does, but should focus on marketing that vision as unified communications instead of calling every IP communication "unified."

I can't blame them entirely. After all, who's against something that's unified, and other companies are doing the same thing. It's just that there are better ways to go if you're really serious about developing new technology instead of rebranding the old.

« He Said, She Said, Apple Didn't Say | Main | How To (Partially) Get Around Windows Activation »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 

  1. Actors, Messages and Low Lock Contention for Java
  2. Of Course The Transformers are Multicore with SMT technology
  3. Find John Fast!!


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. Why I'm Dropping Bing For Google
  2. Video: iPhone Tips And Tricks
  3. Zero-Day Hits Microsoft DirectShow
  4. Palm Pre Sales Reports Not Meshing
  5. Is This Sony Ericsson's First Android Phone?


  1. Microsoft Fix For 'Browse-And-Get-Owned' Flaw Coming Tuesday
  2. Amazon's Kindle 2 Gets A Price Cut
  3. Texting Trolley Operator Indicted
  4. Amazon Launches Web Site For Cell Phones
  5. Military Grapples With Information Overload
  6. DHS Systems More Secure, Inspector General Finds

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007