Commentary

J. Nicholas Hoover
Senior Editor, InformationWeek  

Not Everybody's Sold on WiMax

Nortel, Intel and SprintNextel are betting the house on WiMax, but not everyone is a convert. Cisco, for one, seems wary.

Nortel, Intel and SprintNextel are betting the house on WiMax, but not everyone is a convert. Cisco, for one, seems wary.Charles Giancarlo, Cisco's chief development officer, laid out some of Cisco's reasoning today at the company's annual analyst conference. Fixed WiMax won't isn't a "viable" technology in the developed world, he said, and mobile WiMax isn't yet proven. "Even if WiMax is viable in [the service provider] space, it's still a wireless vendor technology, and I don't think that's enough of a disruption for Cisco to enter the field," Giancarlo said. He hinted that Cisco is more interested in developing 4G technologies that will come after and possibly integrate elements of WiMax.

That's not to say Cisco hasn't put its toe in the water. The company's involved in a project to bring wireless access to the Bay Area, and WiMax is among the access technologies being considered there. Giancarlo says Cisco's also interested in WiMax backhaul and an IP interface for WiMax radios.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Back to the lead, it's interesting that in a networking technology where other major companies have invested heavily, Cisco has chosen to sit tight for now. WiMax advocates believe it's the future of wireless, and carriers like Clearwire and now SprintNextel clearly believe them. So why doesn't Cisco? For one, analysts have told me that AT&T and Verizon look like they may be likely to skip over WiMax on the way to 4G. That could be one reason holding Cisco back. Another reason is that WiMax promises the house, but only delivers a bit of it in today's version. Penetration, distance and bandwidth aren't up to where forecasters initially pegged them. Cisco may be playing it safe in WiMax, but it's not necessarily a bad idea.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links