Topics:
Microsoft
Is The Linux Community Breaking Apart?
I have to admit I have limited hands-on experience with alternate operating systems such as Linux. However, it's the idea of the open source system -- the notion that users themselves (at least, users with technological know-how) are free to build their own applications without worrying about copyright lawyers banging on their doors -- that I really admire. Like all communities, however, the open source movement can be contentious. Two recent articles that have appeared on the InformationWeek site attest to this. In The Microsoft/Novell Deal: Has It Divided The Linux Community? Jacqueline Emigh talks about how some Linux users are being cautiously optimistic about the multimillion-dollar agreement that Microsoft and Novell struck last November, while others are trying to organize petitions, boycotts, and other protests against what they see as a violation of the spirit of the GNU General Public License (GPL), which lays out the rules under which open source may be used. Meanwhile, in the article GNU License Revision Sparks Open-Source Debate, Stacy Cowley tells how a new version of the agreement, GPL 3, also is dividing open-source advocates; for example, pitting GPL author Richard Stallman against Linux kernel creator Linus Torvalds. This disagreement is so fierce that some projects are being put out with a "version 2 only" limitation. Where do you stand on these issues? Do you think the Microsoft/Novell deal is good for the industry, or an impending disaster? Is the new version of the GPL a violation of open source freedom or the foundation for a better software environment? Feel free to comment. « Metaphorical Cold Water In Virtual Worlds | Main | Adobe Does VoIP And P2P » |
| Sign Up Now For InformationWeek News Alerts |