Commentary

Barbara Krasnoff
 

Is The Linux Community Breaking Apart?

A lot of talk is going around these days about social networking on the Web and how people are forming new types of communities via sites such as MySpace, Facebook, and LiveJournal. But as far as I'm concerned, the real online communities are those groups of people who gather online wherever they can because of shared interests, shared concerns, or shared values. And one of the most fervent, opinionated, interesting, and influential groups is the open source community.

A lot of talk is going around these days about social networking on the Web and how people are forming new types of communities via sites such as MySpace, Facebook, and LiveJournal. But as far as I'm concerned, the real online communities are those groups of people who gather online wherever they can because of shared interests, shared concerns, or shared values. And one of the most fervent, opinionated, interesting, and influential groups is the open source community.I have to admit I have limited hands-on experience with alternate operating systems such as Linux. However, it's the idea of the open source system -- the notion that users themselves (at least, users with technological know-how) are free to build their own applications without worrying about copyright lawyers banging on their doors -- that I really admire.

Like all communities, however, the open source movement can be contentious. Two recent articles that have appeared on the InformationWeek site attest to this. In The Microsoft/Novell Deal: Has It Divided The Linux Community? Jacqueline Emigh talks about how some Linux users are being cautiously optimistic about the multimillion-dollar agreement that Microsoft and Novell struck last November, while others are trying to organize petitions, boycotts, and other protests against what they see as a violation of the spirit of the GNU General Public License (GPL), which lays out the rules under which open source may be used.


More Windows Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Meanwhile, in the article GNU License Revision Sparks Open-Source Debate, Stacy Cowley tells how a new version of the agreement, GPL 3, also is dividing open-source advocates; for example, pitting GPL author Richard Stallman against Linux kernel creator Linus Torvalds. This disagreement is so fierce that some projects are being put out with a "version 2 only" limitation.

Where do you stand on these issues? Do you think the Microsoft/Novell deal is good for the industry, or an impending disaster? Is the new version of the GPL a violation of open source freedom or the foundation for a better software environment? Feel free to comment.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links