Commentary

PTT By the Minute?!?

Correct me if I am wrong here, but wasn't the major premise of push-to-talk technology (PTT) that it would help save people (enterprises) money by allowing them to avoid using their monthly minute allotment because they were using the walkie-talkie instead? If so, AT&T's new plan to allow customers to use PTT on a per-minute basis negates the entire appeal. Sorry, but if I have to pay by the minute to use the PTT service on my BlackBerry, it just ain't gonna happen. Granted, AT&T's proposed fee of $0.15 per minute is far lower than typical minute overage fees, which fall in the $0.45 to $0.55 range, but still. It just seems counterintuitive to me. Why use a walkie-talkie if you're going to be charged by the minute?

Correct me if I am wrong here, but wasn't the major premise of push-to-talk technology (PTT) that it would help save people (enterprises) money by allowing them to avoid using their monthly minute allotment because they were using the walkie-talkie instead? If so, AT&T's new plan to allow customers to use PTT on a per-minute basis negates the entire appeal.

Sorry, but if I have to pay by the minute to use the PTT service on my BlackBerry, it just ain't gonna happen. Granted, AT&T's proposed fee of $0.15 per minute is far lower than typical minute overage fees, which fall in the $0.45 to $0.55 range, but still. It just seems counterintuitive to me. Why use a walkie-talkie if you're going to be charged by the minute?I think this entire idea is a tactic to increase adoption of PTT usage on the Cingular / AT&T network (I can't call it AT&T just yet). You see, I'd bet no one is using it. At least not in a way that justifies Cingular's investment in the technology. So they figure, aha, get people to use the silly little button, figure out how the service works and then, wham-o, they'll subscribe to the PTT plan. Brilliant! Or not.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

The technology behind Cingular's PTT service differs from Sprint Nextel's. Where Sprint Nextel leverages the old iDEN network, Cingular usees a third party software solution from companies like Kodiak. Sprint Nextel's was far superior for a long time, with much lower latency. The delay in coversations in the initial Cingular (and Verizon Wireless, for that matter) PTT services was noticeable and hampered adoption. They and their partners have corrected those issues for the most part and the services are not on par with that offered by Sprint Nextel, at least in terms of raw performance.

I think the real problem here is image and business case related. There is a very field force, blue collar image associated with those chunky Sprint Nextel iDEN phones and the guys who use them. The reason they were so popular among the field force set is because guys on a construction site need to contact one another all the time. Using minutes to make 100 phone calls a day to the guy up on the scaffolding was not cost effective. So their employers subscribed to the PTT service and the workers were then able to make as many "calls" to their coworkers without eating into their minute plans.

People who are sophisticated enough to use a BlackBerry or other advanced feature phone probably have the budget to run up their minutes.

Hear Me Now, Cingular! I reprogrammed my BlackBerry so the dedicated PTT button accesses another function on the phone. I betcha many others did as well. Sorry, I'll stick to my minutes.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links