Commentary
Vista, Schmista
Last week while working the press room at CES I was afforded a sneak peek at Microsoft's new operating system, Vista. I have to be honest here and say that I was not all that impressed.Last week while working the press room at CES I was afforded a sneak peek at Microsoft's new operating system, Vista. I have to be honest here and say that I was not all that impressed.With Vista's launch imminent (January 30th), I was pleased to have an opportunity to check out the OS before it hits shelves. As you can tell from my intro, it's nothing to write home about.
The problem is, it retains a lot of WinXP's faults: The menus, the folders, the menus, the base Windows code, oh, and did I mention the menus? Sure, Vista is sorta pretty and fluid-like, with windows expanding and collapsing in a very Apple-esque way, but there's no testament to its solidity. Will it crash as often as any of the previous iterations did? Unfortunately there's no real information yet. Vista was released to corporate customers back in November, and there hasn't been a lot of news either way.
More Mobility Insights
White Papers
- How To Regain IT Control In An Increasingly Mobile World - by BlackBerry
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
Reports
- Mobility’s Next Challenge: 8 Steps to a Secure Environment
- Time to Move: How to Ensure 'Mobility' Translates to 'Agility'
Webcasts
- Maximize ROI with Database Consolidation onto Private Clouds
- The ABC's of Cloud Computing in the Midmarket
There was news from hackers, of course, who found major back doors to Windows security as recently as, oh, look, today!
As a Mac and Windows user, my disdain for using Windows has only grown since Apple released OS X 5 years ago. Its beauty, fluidity and solidity have earned it a place in my will (seriously, I am donating money to Apple when I die.). The OS simply works, probably in part due to its Unix core. Solid functionality all the way, even it isn't entirely enterprise friendly.
I remember when Windows 95 first came out, it was being called Mac OS 86, as it called upon the most important features of that ancient OS and rebranded them with the Windows logo and attempted to pass the whole package off as a brand new operating system. Still, it was leaps and bounds better than Windows 3.x, though the Blue Screen of Death was a nice carry-over.
Here we are 12 years later, and Microsoft is pulling the same schtick. It's leaving the real innovation up to its competitors and is leveraging that knowledge in its own products. That's right, Vista is Mac OS X 2001, not-so-cleverly disguised as a wholly different OS.
The bottom line for enterprises that are interested in upgrading to the new system is to take the wait-and-see approach.
Related Reading
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. | |
|
|
T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting! |
Subscribe to RSSResource Links
This Week's Issue
Technology Whitepapers
- Mobile BI: Actionable Intelligence for the Agile Enterprise
- Creating the Enterprise-Class Tablet Environment - by Yankee Group
- The BlackBerry PlayBook tablet's Good Bones - by BlackBerry
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
- New Visual and Wizard-Driven Paradigms for Exploring Data and Developing Analytic Workflows
Featured Resource
This white paper focuses on the critical need to manage outbound content sent via various avenues including email, Instant Messages, text messages, tweets, and Facebook posts. Read More












