Commentary

New Study Shows Which Wireless Network Really Has the Fewest Dropped Calls

Last summer saw a frenzy of advertisements from the wireless network operators, each one claiming that independent research verified that it had the fewest dropped calls, the largest network, the best network, the friendliest network, the hippest network and so on. You'll never believe who ranked first in this study.

Last summer saw a frenzy of advertisements from the wireless network operators, each one claiming that independent research verified that it had the fewest dropped calls, the largest network, the best network, the friendliest network, the hippest network and so on. You'll never believe who ranked first in this study.mindWireless looked at 80 million points of caller data from January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006, and rated Sprint's CDMA network as the network with the fewest dropped calls with a duplicate call percentage of 5.4. mindWireless defined a dropped or "duplicate call" as a call from a cellular device to another wireless device or landline placed within two minutes of a prior call to the same destination, with no call between. Calls to voicemail and push-to-talk calls were excluded. Geographic location, topography and population size are all variables in the performance of a wireless network.

Cingular's legacy AT&T Wireless network ranked second with a duplicate rate of 5.7%, followed by Verizon Wireless with 8%, Cingular's own GSM network with 11.3% and T-Mobile's with 13.8%.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

The results are somewhat surprising because Sprint is generally ranked low in such studies. With these results now public, I am sure Sprint's competitors will have further studies done so they can tailor their marketing messages appropriately.

For now, though, Sprint can thumb its collective nose at the other three major U.S. carriers and set spokesman Ron Livingston on a rampage of "nyah-nah-nah-nah-NAH-naaaah" advertising.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links