The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits

Security

Topics:   Security

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Got Time?


Posted by Patricia Keefe, Mar 2, 2007 05:06 PM

That whole time-change thing that has everyone rolling their eyes -- you know, early daylight-saving time? OK, it's not Y2K. (What could be?) And as I noted in a recent column (which goes into this issue in greater detail), no one is talking disasters of biblical proportions. But there is a little more to this than the momentary irritation of missed appointments and calendars being off an hour.


Think of all the time-sensitive systems out there today -- medical, manufacturing, financial, travel schedules, logistics scheduling and tracking, security systems (and doors and vaults) that open and close based on pre-programmed times. Anything that requires a precise time stamp for legal or audit trail reasons. Think of Sarbanes Oxley (Forrester Research says it will definitely be affected). State governments are certainly worried. Think maybe you should take another look at the systems that support your company's business, and reconfigure the impact?

Because ohhhh, yeah, there's definite fallout here if you don't get your applications and systems switched over to the new daylight-saving time date on time.

But there's more to it than that. Judging from the users I've been hearing from, it's just a time-sucking, cost-building pain in the butt to deal with. Look at PG&E's predicament. It simply decided this was too expensive a change to make, and got permission to bill customers differently to compensate for the impact. So why is this such a pain? Well, for one, too many vendors have wasted the head start they got to deal with this issue (the bill mandating the change was signed in the summer of 2005) and have gone right down to the wire in releasing their patches, which in some cases have to take into account various platforms, access modes, etc. It makes one wonder how well tested they are, and certainly doesn't leave IT much time to do it's own testing. One issue here is that many vendors thought they could leave the fix to the operating system brethren, and realized late in the game that they were wrong, says Ray Wang, a Forrester analyst who has co-written a report on this issue. And if they're late, - where does that leave users?

A lot of these patches are NOT going to work with older versions of software. As Mike Dimyan of Time-Warner pointed out recently, there aren't that many companies who can say they are running the latest version of all their applications. And at this point, he noted, even if vendors gave away the latest updates, most companies couldn't possibly get it installed in time.

So if you've got a mixed environment, you may find some daylight-saving time patches causing other problems even as they solve part of your time issues. Dimyan already has run into this problem. And what about those older versions? What's the fix for them? In some cases, it's going to be "ugly," Dimyan says. And then there's the software that will have to be manually updated, like your custom applications. And you do have customized apps, right?

So, while this problem is certainly solvable, it won't happen without some scrambling, a lot of manpower, a lot of testing and cross testing, a chunk of money and time. You may have plenty of the rest, but the one thing you don't have much left of, right now, is time.

Have you run into problematic patches, cross-compatibility issues, or no patch support for the versions of software you are running? Has your vendor either waited so long to issue a patch or posted such confusing information on its site that it's affected your efforts to update your systems? Tell us about it, and any solutions you've worked out, in the comment field below.

« True Field Mobility: The Wait is Over | Main | Come Get Your Game On »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. HPC Joins the Dummy Revolution?
  2. Detecting Scalability Problems With Intel Parallel Universe Portal
  3. Just Say No To SFAQL Parallelism


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. HTC Droid Eris To Get Android 2.0 Update
  2. Verizon Says Droid Fix Coming In A Few Weeks
  3. iPhone Headed For T-Mobile?
  4. Verizon Calls iPhone A 'Digitally Clueless Beauty Queen'
  5. Intel Floats Cloud Computing On A Chip


  1. Can Electronic Medical Records Be Secured?
  2. Google Chrome OS Previewed
  3. Analytics Brief: 5 Key Steps To Cybersecurity
  4. CIO Profiles: Patti Reilly White, Senior VP And CIO Of Darden Restaurants
  5. The Point-Of-Sale Problem
  6. Air Pressure: Why IT Must Sort Out App Mobilization Challenges

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007