Commentary

Stephen Wellman
 

It's Time For The J.D. Power Wireless Carrier Shuffle

J.D. Power and Associates has released its 2007 Wireless Call Quality Performance Study and the carriers are getting ready to either hype the findings or spin them away, depending on how they fared. On to the rankings.

J.D. Power and Associates has released its 2007 Wireless Call Quality Performance Study and the carriers are getting ready to either hype the findings or spin them away, depending on how they fared. On to the rankings.Verizon Wireless came out on top, taking the lead in four of the six U.S. regions covered and tying with Qwest for highest in a fifth.

J.D. Power's latest study ranked Sprint Nextel in last place in the Mid-Atlantic and Southwest regions.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Of course, Sprint might have a thing or two to say about this latest call quality ranking. Last month, a study from mindWireless looked at 80 million points of caller data from Jan. 1, 2006, to June 30, 2006, and rated Sprint's CDMA network as the network with the fewest dropped calls. That study placed Verizon Wireless in the middle of the major U.S. carriers in terms of dropped calls and duplicate calls.

The J.D. Power and Associates study found that as U.S. carriers upgrade to 3G networks, the overall call quality across the wireless industry has improved.

What do you think? Is Verizon Wireless really the best carrier in the United States in terms of call quality? Or is there that much of a difference between any of the carriers? And if your carrier has gone 3G, have you noticed that your phone calls have improved?


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links