Commentary

Waiting for N-uffman: 802.11n One Step Closer to Reality

The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) said that the industry has accepted draft 2.0 of the 802.11n spec, and is hopeful that the faster wireless LAN standard will be ratified as soon as September. It's about time!

The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) said that the industry has accepted draft 2.0 of the 802.11n spec, and is hopeful that the faster wireless LAN standard will be ratified as soon as September. It's about time!The industry has been waiting for 802.11n for nearly four years. Now that the spec has received 75% approval, the faster wireless networking technology could be speeding up Web surfers in mere months. Thank goodness. When you look at how much the wireless industry has changed in the last four years, the IEEE is lucky we're still interested in 802.11n.

802.11n differs from its a/b/g cousins in bandwidth and throughout with the use of multiple-in, multiple-out (MIMO) antenna arrays. Backhaul limitations aside, the IEEE says the the standard could blast bits through the air at 500 Mbit/s in peak conditions. That's a far cry better than 802.11g's molasses-like 54 MBits/s.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

There's still some work to be done, however. Even though Draft 2.0 doesn't include any major system changes to Draft 1.0, companies and organizations will have to make sure that the pre-n equipment already on the market works with the finalized standard. Many claim that any differences can be accounted for with software upgrades.

I wonder if they're going to charge $1.99 like Apple did...


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links