Commentary

Stephen Wellman
 

Yahoo And Microsoft Fight For Mobile Search While Google Pushes For The Entire Third Screen

I have finally settled back into New York after a jam-packed visit to this year's CTIA Wireless in Orlando, Fla. One of the big stories in the wider media that, surprisingly, didn't generate much insider buzz at CTIA was the on-going war to capture the emerging mobile search market.

I have finally settled back into New York after a jam-packed visit to this year's CTIA Wireless in Orlando, Fla. One of the big stories in the wider media that, surprisingly, didn't generate much insider buzz at CTIA was the on-going war to capture the emerging mobile search market.Yahoo took the initiative earlier this week, showing off its new mobile advertising platform, called Yahoo Mobile Publisher Services. The new platform will let publishers post and manage mobile ads on Yahoo. Some big-name advertisers already are on board, including Pepsi and Hewlett-Packard.

Yahoo is making a strong push to win the mobile search market. Last week the company expanded its oneSearch platform to mobile phones.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Not to be outdone, Microsoft also is aggressively pushing mobile search with its Microsoft Live Search application on Windows Mobile.

So where is Google? Google is busy putting its applications, like Gmail and Blogger, on as many cell phones as it can. Earlier this month Samsung announced a deal to put Google applications on future phones and this week LG at CTIA announced a similar partnership.

While Google certainly isn't ignoring the mobile search market -- the text messaging extension to Google's mobile search tool is very useful -- the company seems to see more opportunity, at least for now, in getting as many applications as possible on the third screen.

Yahoo and Microsoft are trying to capture the mobile search market specifically, while Google seems more interested in owning the entire experience of the third screen. Google wants to get its software on as many phones as possible -- a strategy that doesn't look that different than Microsoft's early vision of putting Windows on every desktop.

Yahoo's efforts in particular seem scattered -- too many applications and confusing application names and not enough focus on the end-user experience across the services. Does Yahoo want to own just mobile search? Mobile search and advertising? Mobile e-mail, too? The answer is yes, but I don't think these products are as seamless as they should be.

So far, Google seems the most focused of the three. Google wants to win the third screen. Period. And it wants to win it the same way it won the desktop, but offering easy-to-use services that do what they promise. Are all of Google's mobile apps as killer the original desktop search engine? No, but many of them are pretty good. Yahoo and Microsoft, on the other hand, don't seem anywhere near this focused on the quality of their mobile products.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links