Commentary

Survey Respondents Not Warming Up To The Idea Of Wi-Fi-Only Phones

Almost 25% of respondents to In-Stat's online survey said "no thanks" to the idea of phones powered solely by Wi-Fi. The rest of the respondents indicated only minimal interest. Is the technology DOA?

Almost 25% of respondents to In-Stat's online survey said "no thanks" to the idea of phones powered solely by Wi-Fi. The rest of the respondents indicated only minimal interest. Is the technology DOA?"Overall survey results indicated that Wi-Fi is a desirable buddy technology to cellular," In-Stat analyst Gemma Tedesco says. "The majority of respondents were interested in having a Wi-Fi communication device together with their cellular phones, albeit only if the Wi-Fi phone or communicator device is cheap."

Looks like that's not happening any time soon. Have you seen prices for Wi-Fi-only phones? They are "way out of line with what most consumers are willing to pay," according to In-Stat. Vonage's phone is $90, Skype's range from $119 and up. Those prices are after rebates. List prices are often $169 and higher.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

On top of that, people are generally satisfied with their cellular phones. They don't see the need to add another wireless calling technology to their homes or businesses.

Converged devices, cell phones that have Wi-Fi calling features, generated more interest among survey respondents. But products that have these capabilities are few and far between. True fixed-mobile convergence also requires that wireless carriers support the technology. Though several trials are under way in the United States, most U.S. carriers have yet to really get behind the technology.

Do Wi-Fi phones have a future? And if so, what role will they really play? Right now those questions remain unanswered.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links