Commentary

Stephen Wellman
 

Benioff Doesn't Deny Google Partnership Rumor

Salesforce.com chairman and CEO Marc Benioff yesterday did not deny rumors that his company may be planning a partnership with Google. Let the Google Apps CRM rumors begin.

Salesforce.com chairman and CEO Marc Benioff yesterday did not deny rumors that his company may be planning a partnership with Google. Let the Google Apps CRM rumors begin.This potential partnership would obviously target Microsoft. It would certainly give Google some ammunition with which to fight its way into the enterprise market. A combined Salesforce solution that offers Google's messaging could be very appealing.

Mike Masnick at Techdirt argues that Google stands to benefit more from this possible partnership more than Salesforce. I don't know if I buy that. I think Salesforce could stand to get as much out of the partnership with Google.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Google right now has the best brand and the biggest reach on planet earth. I fail to see how Salesforce wouldn't benefit from being associated with Google. And it could open up new markets for Salesforce, including prosumers.

By striking a deal now, Salesforce can chose to define how it works with Google, rather than wait for Google Apps to take off and then try to partner with it. Or possibly have to fight Google if it develops a CRM product.

Of course, this all assumes that Salesforce and Google will actually pull the trigger and partner. What do you think? Will Salesforce actually partner with Google? And if so, will either company get anything out of it?


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links