The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Digital Life

Topics:   Digital Life : Second Life : Security

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Internet Age Verification: Why Are We Kidding Ourselves?


Posted by Mitch Wagner, May 12, 2007 05:27 PM

I've singled out Linden Lab for criticism for its scheme to require users of Second Life to offer proof of age before accessing adult content. But Linden Lab is only following standard practice on the Internet, where operators of porn sites and the government agree to pretend that we can verify the ages of people who access adult content online by requiring them to submit electronic documents.


This has been going on for more than a decade now, since the Communications Decency Act of 1996 tried to keep Internet porn away from minors.

Linden Lab's proposal is fairly typical of age-verifications schemes: Users submit a passport, driver's license, or some other government-issued documentation, and are then certified as being over 18 and permitted to access graphically sexual and violent content in Second Life.

What Linden Lab doesn't address is how to keep a kid who wants to see sex or ultra-violence from simply swiping Mom or Dad's credentials and using them. Any kid with the sneakiness to go behind their parents' back to access adult content will also be willing to borrow their parents' credentials. Kids lie about stuff. They break the rules. That's part of being a kid.

I know I made some of these points before but I'm getting increasingly frustrated by some of the discussion of this point in the Second Life community. Linden Lab has issued a post and two clarifications on its official blog and none of these posts addresses the point of how Linden Lab is somehow going to alter human nature and turn us all into a world of people who magically aren't going to lie about their age.

« The Smart Folks At Dr. Dobb's Journal Lead By Example Doing Business At Second Life | Main | Reading The WinHEC Tea Leaves »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
Digital Life Video

 

  1. Sequential Programming: Like Eating Peas with a Straw.
  2. Biomolecular device using self-assembled DNA nanostructures?
  3. Coreinfo v2.0: A Simple Utility to Understand the Manycore Complexity in Windows


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. More Reasons Why Linux Misses The Desktop
  2. Too Much Netbook For Too Litl?
  3. Verizon: $350 ETF Is A Go
  4. Motorola Explains Why Droid Doesn't Have Multi-Touch


  1. Review: Motorola Cliq Smartphone
  2. Florida Hospital Dials Up iPhones For Nurses
  3. Full Nelson: A Web Presence Needs Sizzle, My Nizzle
  4. Is Antivirus Software Dead?
  5. Practical Analysis: The Fastest-Growing Security Threat
  6. InformationWeek Analytics Research: Federated Search

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007