In the wake of Digg's decision to allow entries to include the encryption key for AACS copy protection, several stories have appeared with headline's like "Mob Rule at Digg." I'm no great fan of Digg. It's obviously open to easy manipulation, and too much of what rises to the top is only slightly more important than who fathered Anna Nicole's baby. But the idea that Digg somehow caved in to pressure from a bunch of cyberdelinquents seems to me to be way off the mark.

When Digg launched a couple of years ago it quickly became a poster child for the Web 2.0 theorists who saw it as an application of the theories in James Surowiecki's book, The Wisdom of Crowds, to the Web.

Exactly how the crowd came to be seen as a mob I'm not sure. Some of it seems to be sour grapes from whiners who haven't been able to get their own posts elevated to Digg's front page -- see Little Green Footballs' curiously prescient post, for example. It's human nature. If we like the result, it was the product of the "wisdom of crowds." If we hate the result, it was the result of "mob rule."

But I think something else was at work on Monday, and it's something the Web 2.0 theorists should show some respect for. Digg is, at the end of the day, a parlor game, but even the players of parlor games have the right to expect the game won't be rigged. The Digg audience reacted to the rigging of results on the site with a large and very effective protest. The protest's message to Digg management was that Digg users expected the site to be an honest broker.

Were the posts that included the AACS key in violation of Digg's Terms of Use? Almost certainly, because they were probably violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Question: Were they the action of a mob? Answer: Was the Boston Tea Party the action of a mob? After all, both protests involved acts of disobedience to protest really, really bad legislation.

I think the same principles are involved in both. Kevin Rose, founder of Digg, certainly recognized the seriousness of what he was faced with -- the loss of his site's credibility with its community. I wish Congress would recognize the same and do something about the DMCA.

Democracy is not neat. Even in the small things like the AACS protest it's a messy business, with no clear-cut rights and wrongs. Freedom gets really fuzzy at the edges where it runs into responsibility, but it's still worth fighting for. We live in a country that was founded in protest. We should know better than anybody that protest is often the wisdom of crowds.