The InformationWeek -- Blogs

Digital Life

Topics:   Digital Life : Second Life

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Second Life Adding Age Verification. Identity Thieves Celebrate


Posted by Mitch Wagner, May 7, 2007 05:37 PM

Linden Lab plans in mid-May to introduce age verification systems to Second Life designed to keep kids out of adult areas. It's almost certainly legally necessary, to protect the company and adult content providers in-world from civil and criminal prosecution. But, still, it's a bad idea. It won't stop kids from accessing adult content. And it provides tremendous opportunity for identity thieves, creating a rich store of Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, dates of birth, and other identifying information.


When the age verification system goes in place, users -- known in Second Life jargons as "residents" -- will be required to provide a one-time proof of identity, such as driver's license, passport or ID card, to access mature content in Second Life, according to a statement on the Second Life official blog.

The measure appears to be a Band-Aid. Any kid with enough rebelliousness to want to access porn behind Mom and Dad's back will likely also have the gumption to borrow their driver's license to do it.

Moreover, the repository of identifying information will be a juicy plum for identity thieves. Linden Lab becomes a candidate to join the long, long parade of companies and government agencies that accidently exposed confidential customer data. Linden Lab says it won't store the data after it verifies' a resident's age, but it also says it's using a third-party company -- which it did not identify -- to perform the verification, and Linden Lab didn't say whether the third-party company would store the information. Even if the third party doesn't store the information, the information will be vulnerable to interception in transit between the customer and verification service.

And yet, I don't know any better way to block kids from accessing mature areas. And the measure is almost certainly essential to Linden Lab, and Second Life providers of mature content, from being prosecuted for distributing porn to minors.

In other words: It's a bad idea, but don't blame Linden Lab. It's not their fault. This dumb idea came from Washington.

I've got an interview request with Linden Lab, still waiting to hear back from them.

Linden Lab said in its blog:

Second Life has always been restricted to those over 18. All Residents personally assert their age on registration. When we receive reports of underage Residents in Second Life, we close their account until they provide us with proof of age. This system works well, but as the community grows and the attractions of Second Life become more widely known, we’ve decided to add an additional layer of protection.

In addition to Second Life, Linden Lab runs a second virtual world, Teen Second Life for 13-17-year-olds, which is forbidden to all but a small number of authorized adults.

People who run areas in Second Life (known as "land owners" in in-world jargon) will be required to flag mature content, Linden Lab said.

What's the definition of "mature content?" ""We trust that common sense will prevail. As a general rule, “Adult Content” is any content that is explicitly sexual or excessively violent in nature," Linden Lab said in its blog.

Linden Lab said: "We hope you’ll agree that the small inconvenience of doing this once is far outweighed by the benefits of protecting minors from inappropriate content. Further, this system will assist landowners in engaging in lawful businesses."

Linden Lab said: "The verification system will be run by a third party specializing in age and identity authentication." Oh, good! Another party brought into the fray to create another possible point of failure where information might leak out to identity thieves!

Residents with paid accounts, known as "premium" accounts, will be charged a "nominal" fee in the in-world micropayment system used in Second Life, known as Linden Dollars. The fee will be less than L$10 -- less than a nickel in US currency. Free account members will have to pay a larger amount to access adult areas, but they'll be able to continue to access non-adult content with free accounts without having to go through verification.

Linden Lab said: "Residents will provide a few simple details about their identity – generally, name, date of birth, and address. US Residents will be asked to provide the last four digits of their Social Security Number, while non-US Residents may need to provide a passport or national ID number." Necessary documentation will vary country-by-country, but could include passport, driver’s license, name, address, or a national ID number such as a Social Security number.

After providing the identifying information, residents can continue to remain anonymous in-world, Linden Lab said. I know what they meant to say: They'll keep the information confidential (unless, of course, there's a data leak. Whoops!) But the choice of words is unfortunately Orwellian: Your identity will be anonymous as soon as you identify yourself.

By the way, earlier I described how Second Life is for people age 18 and older, and Teen Second Life is for people aged 13-7. One unfortunate side-effect of this: That means parents can't go into Second Life side-by-side with their kids. That's ironic -- in the name of protecting kids, Linden Lab is separating them from their parents. But Linden Lab CEO and founder Philip Rosedale said last week he'd like to correct that problem by opening a family-friendly Second Life

Update 6:10 pm EDT: Linden Lab clarifies the policy..

« Are You Ready For The $10-Multicore-Cell Phone Future? | Main | Voice Coming To Second Life May 23, Maybe, According To Somewhat-Unclear Statement From Linden Lab »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
Digital Life Video

 

  1. Just Say No To SFAQL Parallelism
  2. QuickThread: A New C++ Multicore Library
  3. Speeding Up Code Without Doing Anything


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. Thoughts On The Motorola Droid
  2. Motorola Promises Fix For Droid's Goofy Camera
  3. Specs For Next Motorola Android Phone Leak
  4. Next-Gen BlackBerry Pearl Makes Appearance


  1. Cisco Rolls Out iPhone Security App
  2. Review: Bluetooth Headsets For Mobile Pros
  3. Wolfe's Den: Intel CTO Envisions On-Chip Data Centers
  4. So Much Data, So Little Encryption
  5. Lessons Learned From PCI Compliance
  6. Practical Analysis: How Locked In To Vendors Are You?

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007