Commentary

Verizon Wireless' Strigl Rattles Saber, Says iPhone Killer In The Wings

No, Denny Strigl wasn't talking about T-Mobile's new smartphone. Verizon Wireless' COO recently said in an interview that Verizon is preparing to battle the iPhone with a product it will release later this summer. He even went so far as to take a potshot at AT&T's network, saying, "The issue is not the Apple-ness of the iPhone itself, but with the cellular network that it is running on." Will the war for new customers and growth in the cell phone industry be waged -- and won -- by providing the best devices, or the best service?

No, Denny Strigl wasn't talking about T-Mobile's new smartphone. Verizon Wireless' COO recently said in an interview that Verizon is preparing to battle the iPhone with a product it will release later this summer. He even went so far as to take a potshot at AT&T's network, saying, "The issue is not the Apple-ness of the iPhone itself, but with the cellular network that it is running on." Will the war for new customers and growth in the cell phone industry be waged -- and won -- by providing the best devices, or the best service?I am sure each wireless network operator would argue that the answer is a combination of both. Provide compelling devices on a great network, and customers will come in droves. And they'll stay. But if there's one thing consistent about Verizon Wireless' advertising campaigns, it's that the network and service matter most. The billboards splattered all over the metropolitan NYC area stating such are unavoidable. I stared at "the Verizon Guy" every day on my bus ride into the city. What words were next to him? "Most Reliable Network."

As growth in the cell phone industry begins to cool off, though, network operators will have to steal customers from one another. Market saturation has already reached about 78%. AT&T wasn't shy about its plans to steal other customers. At the press conference held at CES in January, the AT&T (then Cingular) spokesperson quite candidly said AT&T expects people to abandon their current carriers and join AT&T so they can get the iPhone.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Adding hot new products like the iPhone to its roster of devices is one way to attract customers for the short term. Keeping customers for the long term is a matter of providing good, consistent service once they're signed up. The major network operators have been poking at one another for the better part of a year, each claiming theirs is the best, the biggest, the baddest, No. 1, and so on.

Whatever the quality of their networks, Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile have to respond to the iPhone with something, anything, because none of them will have the chance to sell the iPhone until 2012.

Yep, that's right. According to USA Today, the iPhone will only be available from AT&T for the next five years. That's a heck of contract. In fact, Apple is not even allowed to develop a CDMA version of the iPhone during that five-year period. That's intense. No other phone has had such a lengthy distribution contract.

Strigl told USA Today that Verizon's answer to the iPhone is on its way. He said, "We do have a very good response in the mill. You'll see that from us in the late summer." Interestingly, LG is set to announce its new flagship device for Verizon later this summer. Coincidence? You decide.

Having the iPhone (which, by the way, is an unproven product) in its portfolio will likely be a good thing for AT&T in the short run. I wouldn't be surprised if 1 million people buy the thing before the end of the year. How many of them will stay with AT&T after their lengthy contracts are up, though, is another question.

In the meantime, the other three major network operators will have to employ a strong set of tactical maneuvers to fend off the iPhone. They will have to release devices that are exciting enough to convince people to upgrade, rather than cancel contracts and defect. What cell phone manufacturers are going to step up to the plate and deliver?


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links