Commentary

Stephen Wellman
 

Will Mobile Advertising Really Work?

Get ready for advertising on your cell phone. According to AOL CEO Randy Falco the mobile advertising market could be worth $5 billion in the next five years. Is this just a move to defend AOL's decision to buy Third Screen Media? And does mobile advertising really have a chance?

Get ready for advertising on your cell phone. According to AOL CEO Randy Falco the mobile advertising market could be worth $5 billion in the next five years. Is this just a move to defend AOL's decision to buy Third Screen Media? And does mobile advertising really have a chance?Probably so for both questions. All signs right now indicate that the mobile advertising market is poised for some real growth.

The success of mobile advertising, though, is by no means assured. Right now the mobile advertising market is pegged at between $500 million and $900 million. Ad agencies are certainly testing the third screen and big name brands seem willing to spend on their tests.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Despite this, mobile advertising could still flop. As I see it there are three solid reasons why mobile marketing could be DOA.

First, there is the issue of display advertising (i.e. banners). It's not apparent that display advertising will work on mobile devices. Why? Simple. The screen size limits the ability of most mobile browsers to work as well as desktop browsers. If you add the demands of a display ad on top of this already limited real estate of a mobile phone screen, the chances of success are limited. I suspect that initial campaigns with display ads are doing well due to the novelty factor, but I don't know if it will work in the long-term. Then again, I don't know if the mobile browser paradigm, much less the display ad one, will work either.

The second issue surrounds SMS. Thanks to short codes and other marketing premiums, SMS as a marketing channel has already taken off. But it's a channel with limits. Thanks to the dump truck of e-mail marketing, I don't see consumers putting up with text message marketing unless it delivers real value. Text marketers are already gun shy about using this channel to pester consumers who have little patience for messages they don't want (and, in many cases, have to pay their carrier for receiving). These limits could severely hamper the growth of text message marketing.

The third challenge is mobile search -- or the lack thereof. I have had several people try to talk to me about mobile search marketing. This is kind of a challenge since mobile search is still very much an emerging category, much less mobile search marketing.

As we all know the bulk of successful online advertising these days is search-based. It's simple, text link ads on Google and search-based ads are just more relevant. Obviously, marketers are eager to replicate this success on the third screen. But for that to happen, mobile search has to, you know, actually take off. Without viable mobile search, there won't be any mobile search advertising. In a sense, predicting the growth of mobile advertising before mobile search has had a chance to develop is putting the cart before the horse.

There is also one other issue. The overall challenge for mobile marketing will always be the channel itself. People have very personal affiliations with their cell phones. They don't want their devices modified or messaged without explicit permission.

And unlike the desktop, the mobile universe doesn't give people that much time or space to explore or play around. When you combine this with the personal nature of the mobile medium that means that mobile ads are going to have to be even more relevant than their desktop cousins and marketers are going to need even more permissioning. That's a tall order to fill.

What do you think? Will mobile advertising become a $5 billion market? Or will it flop?


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links