Commentary

Mary Hayes Weier
 

YouTube, You Screwed?

More businesses want to get involved with YouTube. It's young, it's hip, it's "Web 2.0." But don't mistake YouTube for child's play. As a Pittsburgh law firm is learning, there can be ugly repercussions to posting video for the whole world to see.

More businesses want to get involved with YouTube. It's young, it's hip, it's "Web 2.0." But don't mistake YouTube for child's play. As a Pittsburgh law firm is learning, there can be ugly repercussions to posting video for the whole world to see.The firm, Cohen & Grigsby, recorded its immigration law conference in May and posted it to YouTube. In one segment of the hours-long video, two attorneys are seen telling the audience how to minimally advertise job postings to best avoid hearing from "qualified and interested" U.S. workers if they have a foreign worker in mind for the job. Federal law requires that an employer make a permanent job posting available to qualified U.S. citizens before hiring a noncitizen.

An anti-outsourcing/anti-H-1B organization of IT pros called the Programmers Guild got hold of the video, and that's all she wrote. The organization copied the video and continues to play it at the site, adorning it with accusations such as advertising fake jobs is an act of fraud.


More Global CIO Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

When I called Cohen & Grigsby yesterday afternoon I could tell damage control had been launched (and no comment yet from the firm). Within two hours of that call, it pulled its video from YouTube. The Programmers Guild gleefully noted it still had a copy for anyone to view online, and there's nothing the firm could do about that. (Here's yesterday's news story.)

Let's set aside the question of these attorney's ethics and the whole is-it-xenophobia-or-corporate-greed? debate. That topic gets discussed a lot on our Web site in readers' comments to blogs and news articles. What's really fascinating, I think, is the power of YouTube to enlighten, and to destroy.

Cohen & Grigsby obviously saw an opportunity to offer its conference attendees a back-up; they could go to YouTube and view any segments they might have missed. The firm probably saw it as some extra PR, too. But my guess is it didn't turn out to be the kind they hoped for.

The law firm conference video reminds me of another incident, reported back in August by the Washington Post, in which a Lockheed Martin engineer ratted on his company for producing what he claimed were poorly designed Coast Guard patrol boats. The engineer complained to his bosses, government investigators, and congress people. Unsatisfied with the lack of responses, he posted a 10-minute video about the allegedly faulty boats on YouTube.

These should be wake-up calls to businesses everywhere. With YouTube, the whole world is watching. Don't brush it off as a cutesy Web 2.0 technology. This is powerful stuff.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links