The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Digital Life

Topics:   Digital Life

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

No iPhone Nano for You


Posted by Thomas Claburn, Jul 10, 2007 07:44 PM

J.P. Morgan, the source of the rumor that a low-end iPhone based on Apple's iPod Nano is being developed, today issued a research note distancing itself from that claim.

If you didn't see that denial coming, you were probably too busy admiring your reflection in your iPhone's lustrous screen.

The analyst behind the iPhone Nano rumor, Kevin Chang, apparently based his report on an Apple patent application and his own interaction with the manufacturing companies in Asia.

Apple patent applications are, in general, terrible sources for product specifics. They'll give you a sense of the technology Apple is developing, but the final manifestation of that technology is very hard to predict because Apple's lawyers word the company's patents to cover phones, computers, and all manner of electronic devices.

But, really, the whole idea of an iPhone Nano runs smack into the ugly reality of usability. Apple's iPhone is about as small as you'd want a phone to be. Thumb typing on a Nano-sized screen would just be awkward and the device's small size would reduce its value as a media viewer.

I suspect Apple will eventually release a low-end iPhone, perhaps in 2008. It may even be a bit smaller than the iPhone's current form factor. I just hope Apple makes it large enough that it's not a choking hazard.

« iPhone Vs. Blender (Guess Who Wins?) | Main | Microsoft Avoids GPL Trap To Step Into Snare »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
Digital Life Video


  1. Actors, Messages and Low Lock Contention for Java
  2. Of Course The Transformers are Multicore with SMT technology
  3. Find John Fast!!


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. Why I'm Dropping Bing For Google
  2. 3G iPhone Burns User
  3. 64-Bit Firefox: What's Your Hurry?
  4. So Long, And Thanks, Google Earth, For All The Fish
  5. Windows 7 Pricing: How Much Lower?


  1. Review: Apple's Speedy iPhone 3GS
  2. Tech Innovation USA: From Resilient Networks To Self-Scheduling Devices
  3. How Government's Driving Cloud Computing Ahead
  4. Government As Early Adopter
  5. InformationWeek Analytics: Data Loss Prevention
  6. Strategic Security: Web Single Sign-On

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007