Commentary

Thomas Claburn
 

No iPhone Nano for You

J.P. Morgan, the source of the rumor that a low-end iPhone based on Apple's iPod Nano is being developed, today issued a research note distancing itself from that claim. If you didn't see that denial coming, you were probably too busy admiring your reflection in your iPhone's lustrous screen.

J.P. Morgan, the source of the rumor that a low-end iPhone based on Apple's iPod Nano is being developed, today issued a research note distancing itself from that claim.

If you didn't see that denial coming, you were probably too busy admiring your reflection in your iPhone's lustrous screen.The analyst behind the iPhone Nano rumor, Kevin Chang, apparently based his report on an Apple patent application and his own interaction with the manufacturing companies in Asia.


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Apple patent applications are, in general, terrible sources for product specifics. They'll give you a sense of the technology Apple is developing, but the final manifestation of that technology is very hard to predict because Apple's lawyers word the company's patents to cover phones, computers, and all manner of electronic devices.

But, really, the whole idea of an iPhone Nano runs smack into the ugly reality of usability. Apple's iPhone is about as small as you'd want a phone to be. Thumb typing on a Nano-sized screen would just be awkward and the device's small size would reduce its value as a media viewer.

I suspect Apple will eventually release a low-end iPhone, perhaps in 2008. It may even be a bit smaller than the iPhone's current form factor. I just hope Apple makes it large enough that it's not a choking hazard.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links