Commentary

Alexander Wolfe
 

Post Pokes Pogue Over Positive iPhone Press

A tabloid tempest in a teapot may be brewing, following an item in Page Six of The New York Post, which is shocked (shocked!) to discover New York Times tech columnist David Pogue praising Apple's iPhone within the pages of the Old Gray Lady while writing a book on the side about how to use the device.

A tabloid tempest in a teapot may be brewing, following an item in Page Six of The New York Post, which is shocked (shocked!) to discover New York Times tech columnist David Pogue praising Apple's iPhone within the pages of the Old Gray Lady while writing a book on the side about how to use the device.The Page Six squib, sarcastically headlined "All The iPhone Plugs That Fit," implies an unseemly connection between Pogue's positive review of the iPhone in the Times (here, login required), "The iPhone Matches Most of Its Hype," and the publication of his book iPhone: The Missing Manual.

Page Six approvingly quotes Jack Shafer, media critic of Slate: "The success of [Pogue]'s book directly relates to the success of the iPhone. I believe in disclosure, and I don't think it's possible to write a fair, ethical review of a product if you stand to benefit from the result."


More Global CIO Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

On defense for the Times is a spokesperson, who says: "The editors knew he was working on a book about the iPhone, and we do not see a conflict of interest that would have required disclosure of this in the articles he wrote for us about the iPhone."

I was prepared to think that there might actually be a germ of a conflict here, especially given that response from the Times. However, when you actually look at what Pogue wrote in his iPhone review, you see that he bent over backward to be, as the flagship cable station of the Post's parent company might put it, fair and balanced.

Far from being a, er, phone job, Pogue gets to the iPhone's negatives in the third paragraph of his Times review:

"As it turns out, much of the hype and some of the criticisms are justified. The iPhone is revolutionary; it's flawed. It's substance; it's style. It does things no phone has ever done before; it lacks features found even on the most basic phones."

Much more damning is Page Six's calling out of Pogue for a vanity video venture-ette in which he took part. Wrote Page Six: "Eyebrows were raised earlier this month when Pogue ... videotaped a musical homage in which he sings, 'I want an iPhone,' to the tune of 'My Way.' The Times ran the embarrassing video on its Web site."

That's not entirely accurate (though close enough for the Post). Strictly speaking, the Times didn't "run" the video. Pogue blogged about it on his Times blog, and included a YouTube link.

Good sport though Pogue obviously is, it's a video only a mother -- his -- could love. Still, I have to give him props for not shying away from criticism, even in this content form in which he's so clearly a newbie. I'm thinking of the verse that goes: "Concerns, I have a few; It's got some flaws, we may just face it; No keys, no memory card; The battery's sealed -- you can't replace it."

But don't take my word for it. Watch all three minutes and 17 seconds yourself:

Your turn, Mr. Mossberg.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links