Commentary

Mitch Wagner
Executive Editor, Community  

Microsoft Delays Upgraded Office For The Mac, Shoots Itself In The Foot

Earlier this week, I sent a very authoritative e-mail to my editors, explaining that Microsoft would likely update the Mac version of Office in the first couple of weeks of August. A day later, Microsoft announced that the update will be delayed until January. Do you ever have weeks like that?

Earlier this week, I sent a very authoritative e-mail to my editors, explaining that Microsoft would likely update the Mac version of Office in the first couple of weeks of August. A day later, Microsoft announced that the update will be delayed until January. Do you ever have weeks like that?


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Macworld quotes Craig Eisler, general manager of the Microsoft Macintosh Business Unit: "We made the decision to do this so we could give users the type of quality that they deserve... This is a quality-driven decision."

Apple bloggers made with the funny in response:

Daring Fireball: "Translation: It's not done yet."

MacUser: "Sure, it sounds reasonable, but what other excuse are they really going to give? 'Oh, we totally forgot we were supposed to be working on Office, because we were all playing the Halo 3 demo. Our bad!'"

Other reasons for the delay: Apple's switch to Intel's chips, and converting Microsoft's new XML file format to the Mac platform, according to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.

Microsoft had planned to release the software in the second half of this year, so a delay to January really isn't much. However, I know I've talked to a few Mac users who -- like me -- expected it in the autumn or earlier, and to us the delay is a shock.

Microsoft now says it will release the software to manufacturers in December, which will put it on retail shelves in January and in enterprises the first quarter of 2008. The company plans to showcase the final version of Office 2008 for the Mac at the Macworld Conference Jan. 14-18.

So who's going to be hurt by this decision? Macworld's Philip Michaels says it's not the users or Apple. Microsoft is the biggest victim of its own delays. While Office is one of the last major Mac apps to add native compatibility with Intel hardware, Apple users aren't delaying buying new Macs to ensure Office compatibility, as they did with programs like the Adobe line.

And if I were Microsoft, that would worry me a bit. Sure, it's never pleasant to get grief from your customers about a product delay. But isn't that better than a shrug?

For every day that Office 2008 doesn't come out, that's another day for users to get accustomed to not having it -- and to wonder whether they even need Office in the first place. Speaking personally, I've been getting a little tired of Entourage's eccentricities. Originally, I was planning to see if Office 2008 improved matters any; now I'm wondering if it might be better to use the next six months to explore alternatives. I can't believe I'm the only Mac user mulling over that consideration.

A decade ago, Bill Gates appeared at Macworld Expo to announce what amounted to a bailout of Apple, including a pledge to continue supporting Mac with the Office. But Apple is a lot stronger now; it just had its best-ever sales quarter, Michaels notes. "I'm not saying Microsoft is becoming irrelevant to the Mac platform, but it does seem like the 800-pound gorilla has slimmed down recently," he said.

Mac sales of Office are becoming increasingly important to Microsoft. Mac Office sales are growing much faster than Office for Windows, the Associated Press notes: "Sales of Office for Macs rose about 72% from 2001 to 2006, compared with an increase of about 18% for Windows versions. Sales of the Mac versions made up about 20% of dollars spent on Office at U.S. retail stores and Web sites in 2006, up from 4% in 2001."

Update: 8 pm EDT: A friend read the first paragraph of this blog post and noted that it wasn't Microsoft that shot itself in the foot. Well, all right, we both did.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links