Commentary

Barbara Krasnoff
 

Backward Into The Future

At a trade show last year, a PR rep steered me happily toward an IP phone that came equipped with a camera and a display so you could easily have face-to-face conversations over the Internet. I don't remember exactly what the rep said after that -- I was too busy flashing back to the 1964 World's Fair, where AT&T touted its futuristic, just-around-the-corner Picturephone.

At a trade show last year, a PR rep steered me happily toward an IP phone that came equipped with a camera and a display so you could easily have face-to-face conversations over the Internet. I don't remember exactly what the rep said after that -- I was too busy flashing back to the 1964 World's Fair, where AT&T touted its futuristic, just-around-the-corner Picturephone.I find it fascinating to look back at past predictions of what the future would be -- especially in terms of technology. Sometimes the technology simply doesn't happen (where is my hovercar, anyway?). Sometimes it does happen, but nobody is really interested (if you've got a webcam you can easily set up a VoIP session where you converse with a friend in video -- but do you really want to take up the bandwidth on something that boring?). And sometimes, the technology has arrived, and is in use, but we no longer think it's a big deal.

For example, an article from the December 1900 issue of the Ladies Home Journal (as reprinted by a fascinating blog called Paleo-Future) posits that, in the year 2000, hot and cold air will be turned on from spigots (i.e. central heating and air conditioning); there will be airships maintained as deadly war vessels by all nations; wireless telephones will span the world; automobiles will be the universal mode of transportation; and everyone will walk ten miles a day (well, you can't win 'em all).


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

You don't necessarily have to go all that far back to find interesting and reasonably accurate predictions of how future technology may change our lives. For example, an article by Myron Berger, in the September 21, 1986 issue of the NY Times, describes how a new device called a "mouse" and the use of pictures on computers (such as the "pull-down menu") could revolutionize the use of computers by allowing neophytes to learn them more easily. "If computers represent the brave new world," Berger wrote, "the simplicity offered by these new products may diminish the amount of bravery many of us need to enter that world."

A lot of technologies and Web sites claim these days to be revolutionary and the lead-in to a glorious and better future. This year alone, I would put Twitter, Microsoft Vista, the iPhone, and various models of Ultra-Mobile PCs into the category of technologies that have been claimed (either by their creators, or by their adherents) to be changing the world.

It would be interesting to see, 50 or 100 years hence, which -- if any -- of these turn out to be the truly revolutionary tech.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links