Commentary

CIOs Losing Interest In Linux?

Say it ain't so! What did the open source operating system do to deserve such ignominy?

Say it ain't so! What did the open source operating system do to deserve such ignominy?According to the most recent results of a quarterly research survey of more than 60 CIOs by investment firm UBS, as reported by my colleague Richard Martin, a significant number of respondents say they won't be using Linux this year, significantly more than expressed those same sentiments last year.

"We believe it should be expected that Linux operating system growth will slow from the significant growth rates of the past few years," according to UBS analyst Heather Bellini, who headed the study


More Global CIO Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

According to UBS, 90% of the CIOs surveyed who don't already use Linux (47% of the total CIO group, according to Barrons) say they won't implement it this year. That's up from January, when 87% of the non-Linux-using CIOs snubbed the open source OS, and up significantly from last year when 60% said they wouldn't be caught dead in the same room with Linux.

So much for Linux making new friends, I guess. What's the hang-up? Are these Linux laggards waiting for Vista Longhorn? Or conversely, are they intimidated by Micrsosoft's patent-saber rattling around Linux?

If more than half of the CIOs say they've already implemented Linux, that means it has plenty of loyal friends. And that loyalty is likely to increase: "The penetration level of Linux among existing customers -- i.e., the portion of businesses' overall server resources represented by Linux -- remains low at around 8%, according to the CIOs surveyed, leading the UBS analysts to assert that 'we still see room for a considerable uptick in penetration levels.' "

But new friends are as important as old ones, as your Mom probably told you. What's Linux got to do to make new friends?


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links