Commentary

Stephen Wellman
 

Google Is Still More Of A Threat To Madison Avenue Than To Microsoft

Despite all the techie hoopla surrounding Google's launch of a PowerPoint-like application this week, Google is still a much bigger threat to those who make their money in advertising than it is to Microsoft.

Despite all the techie hoopla surrounding Google's launch of a PowerPoint-like application this week, Google is still a much bigger threat to those who make their money in advertising than it is to Microsoft.The truly big Google news this week is not free office software but Google's new ad format, the Gadget Ad.

Make no mistake about it; the Google Gadget Ad is dangerous. Google is stepping firmly into the banner display ad market and it is pushing a new, innovative format. While we've seen a lot of bellyaching in recent weeks that Google has the potential to be an innovative and disruptive software company (I agree with people like my colleague John Soat that it does), for now Google is still an ad company. And it knows how to disrupt ad markets.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Check out the cacophony of praise for Google's trials with Gadget Ads. Check out the names of agencies and clients: Paramount Vintage & MB, Honda & RPA, Sierra Mist & Tribal DDB, Six Flags & neo Ogilvy, the list goes on. Of course, this is Google's sales pitch, but still. It's impressive.

And that isn't all. Google also launched the mobile version of AdSense this week. While Yahoo has offered mobile ads commercially for the last six months, Google's brand and online market share could allow it to eclipse Yahoo's mobile offering pretty quickly.

When you combine the prospect of a innovative new form of display advertising with Google's pending closure of its deal for DoubleClick and an aggressive push into the fast-emerging mobile ad market, you can see that Google is ready to bring down the hammer on the online ad market.

If I were either Yahoo or MSN, I'd be pretty scared right about now.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links