The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits

Over The Air

Topics:   Mobile

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Why Apple Won't Bite on Spectrum Auction


Posted by Richard Martin, Sep 10, 2007 06:46 PM

According to BusinessWeek, sources say that "Steve Jobs & Co. have studied the implications of joining" the bidding in the upcoming FCC auction of valuable 700MHz spectrum. Well, I have "studied the implications" of becoming the head of the World Bank. Doesn't mean it's going to happen.


There are plenty of reasons why Apple, as compared to, say, Google, would be foolish to bid on the 700MHz band, which is considered the last prime real estate for advanced wireless networks in this country. (The auction is expected to generate upwards of $15 billion for the U.S. Treasury.)

Google is an advertising company, and it's active on an array of mobile fronts to create an open wireless ecosystem in which consumers and businesses will use its Web services, and click on ads it serves. Apple is a consumer electronics vendor and a provider of rich media, in the form of iTunes. Attempting to build (or control) its own wireless network, on spectrum it owns, would be akin to Toyota trying to build its own highway system: the cost is prohibitive, and why compete with existing roads?

Another argument against this shakily sourced rumor was provided last week by a pair of economists, Stanford University's Greg Rosston and Peter Cramton of the University of Maryland, who are acting as advisers to Frontline Wireless LLC in its own effort to win in the spectrum auction. Rosston and Cramton are auction experts, and they argue that the high "reserve prices" (i.e., minimum bids) set by the FCC for the 700MHz frequencies mean that a) the auction rules will favor the incumbents, i.e. the big wireless carriers, and b) the auction could fail altogether.

Their point boils down to this: the FCC has stipulated that if the reserve prices (equivalent to close to 100% of the spectrum's expected total value) are not met in the first round of the bidding, a "re-auction" will follow shortly. The new bidding will move forward either without reserve prices or with significantly lowered ones, and will not include the "open access" provisions mandated in the rules for the initial auction.

That means that Verizon Wireless and AT&T have a strong incentive to sit out the first wave of bidding, expecting their less deep-pocketed rivals not to meet the reserve prices, so that the incumbents can snap up the wavelengths at lower prices, and without the open-access rules (which the carriers despise) in the subsequent rounds. And it means that unless Steve Jobs wants to spend close to Apple's annual revenue on spectrum rights alone – to say nothing of the cost of actually building a wireless network to run over the frequencies – he'd be foolish to enter this rich man's game.

« CIOs Are Worried About Mobile Security | Main | CIOs Better Check With Legal Before Touting This Tool »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
Mobile Video


Sign Up For The Over The Air Newsletter
Every Friday, our experts and analysts explore the business, strategy, and management issues most important to mobile and wireless technology.

Sign up for our free, weekly newsletter today!

Newsletter Archives


 

  1. How To Do Parallelism Without Getting Egg On Your Face
  2. Managed Threads Are Different From Windows Threads
  3. Designing Applications for Massive Multicore Processors


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


  1. Microsoft Gets Windows Phone 7 Strategy Right
  2. Google Gains While Palm Loses Smartphone Share
  3. iPhone Scientifically Proven To Be Addictive


  1. GDC: Sony Unveils PS3 Motion Controller
  2. Google Debuts Product Inventory Search, Apps Macros
  3. Wipro To Boost U.S. Hiring
  4. GDC: Microsoft Surface Plays Dungeons & Dragons
  5. Microsoft Aids IT Training In California
  6. Former TSA Worker Charged With Hacking

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007