Commentary

Richard Martin
 

Why Apple Won't Bite on Spectrum Auction

According to BusinessWeek, sources say that "Steve Jobs & Co. have studied the implications of joining" the bidding in the upcoming FCC auction of valuable 700MHz spectrum. Well, I have "studied the implications" of becoming the head of the World Bank. Doesn't mean it's going to happen.

According to BusinessWeek, sources say that "Steve Jobs & Co. have studied the implications of joining" the bidding in the upcoming FCC auction of valuable 700MHz spectrum. Well, I have "studied the implications" of becoming the head of the World Bank. Doesn't mean it's going to happen.There are plenty of reasons why Apple, as compared to, say, Google, would be foolish to bid on the 700MHz band, which is considered the last prime real estate for advanced wireless networks in this country. (The auction is expected to generate upwards of $15 billion for the U.S. Treasury.)

Google is an advertising company, and it's active on an array of mobile fronts to create an open wireless ecosystem in which consumers and businesses will use its Web services, and click on ads it serves. Apple is a consumer electronics vendor and a provider of rich media, in the form of iTunes. Attempting to build (or control) its own wireless network, on spectrum it owns, would be akin to Toyota trying to build its own highway system: the cost is prohibitive, and why compete with existing roads?


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Another argument against this shakily sourced rumor was provided last week by a pair of economists, Stanford University's Greg Rosston and Peter Cramton of the University of Maryland, who are acting as advisers to Frontline Wireless LLC in its own effort to win in the spectrum auction. Rosston and Cramton are auction experts, and they argue that the high "reserve prices" (i.e., minimum bids) set by the FCC for the 700MHz frequencies mean that a) the auction rules will favor the incumbents, i.e. the big wireless carriers, and b) the auction could fail altogether.

Their point boils down to this: the FCC has stipulated that if the reserve prices (equivalent to close to 100% of the spectrum's expected total value) are not met in the first round of the bidding, a "re-auction" will follow shortly. The new bidding will move forward either without reserve prices or with significantly lowered ones, and will not include the "open access" provisions mandated in the rules for the initial auction.

That means that Verizon Wireless and AT&T have a strong incentive to sit out the first wave of bidding, expecting their less deep-pocketed rivals not to meet the reserve prices, so that the incumbents can snap up the wavelengths at lower prices, and without the open-access rules (which the carriers despise) in the subsequent rounds. And it means that unless Steve Jobs wants to spend close to Apple's annual revenue on spectrum rights alone - to say nothing of the cost of actually building a wireless network to run over the frequencies - he'd be foolish to enter this rich man's game.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links