Commentary

Alexander Wolfe
 

Apple Sticking To Guns Amid iPhone 'Bricking' Fiasco

Apple is apparently intent on hanging tough amid the growing iPhone bricking controversy. That's the message I'm getting from Apple's public-relations department.

Apple is apparently intent on hanging tough amid the growing iPhone bricking controversy. That's the message I'm getting from Apple's public-relations department.I queried Apple's designated iPhone spokeswoman, Jennifer Bowcock, and asked whether the company's position had evolved since she was quoted in The New York Times over the weekend. ("If the damage was due to use of an unauthorized software application, voiding their warranty, they should purchase a new iPhone.")

"Apple's position has not changed since we issued our statement last week," Bowcock e-mailed me late yesterday. The statement to which she refers was issued on Sept. 24, prior to the iPhone update which "bricked" phones which users had unlocked or onto which they'd downloaded unauthorized third-party apps. Here's the statement:


More Global CIO Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

"Apple has discovered that many of the unauthorized iPhone unlocking programs available on the Internet cause irreparable damage to the iPhone's software, which will likely result in the modified iPhone becoming permanently inoperable when a future Apple-supplied iPhone software update is installed. Apple plans to release the next iPhone software update, containing many new features including the iTunes Wi-Fi Music Store, later this week [i.e, last week]. Apple strongly discourages users from installing unauthorized unlocking programs on their iPhones. Users who make unauthorized modifications to the software on their iPhone violate their iPhone software license agreement and void their warranty. The permanent inability to use an iPhone due to installing unlocking software is not covered under the iPhone's warranty."

I don't want to reargue my entire beef with Apple in this post. (Read Sunday's post and the 500+ reader comments if you want to get into that.)

Suffice to say that Apple's position is simply nuts from a Marketing 101 standpoint. Why would you want to beat up on your most loyal customers, those early adopters who are eager to boldly take their iPhones -- and I think the "Star Trek" analogy is apt -- into territory where no mobile devices have gone before?

You've got to wonder why Apple seems to be going out of its way to extract defeat from iPhone victory. It's got a device its faithful customers love. The way it's treating them, that's all it'll have left -- the Apple Kool-Aid drinkers who believe Jobs knows best, no matter what. Everyone else will be looking to BlackBerry, Nokia, and Palm to satisfy their phone-of-the-future needs.

To put a Web 2.0 twist on an old saying, perhaps arrogance comes ahead of Steve Jobs's fall.

P.S. See my original post, Apple Users Talking Class-Action Lawsuit Over iPhone Locking, as well as California Lawyer Seeking Plaintiffs For iPhone Class-Action Suit. For a look at a company that's trying to capitalize on the situation, see Nokia Touts Its Open Platform As Antidote To Apple's iPhone. Plus, just added: Apple Update Apparently Bricking iPhones Of Some Legit Users, Too.

[Update: Friday, Oct. 5, 7:00pm. See Apple Class-Action Suit Filed By California Man Over iPhone Bricking.]


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links