Commentary

CTIA Offers State Of The Industry Snapshot At Confab

If you believe everything CTIA, The Wireless Association has to say about the wireless industry, it would seem like it is firing on all cylinders. However, the rosy statistics don't quite cover up all the thorns.

If you believe everything CTIA, The Wireless Association has to say about the wireless industry, it would seem like it is firing on all cylinders. However, the rosy statistics don't quite cover up all the thorns.OK, so first let's get the freshly polished survey results out of the way:

What does all that add up to? More people are spending more money on wireless services. Considering that mobile phones are becoming peoples' main communications devices, the continued increases in these numbers is not particularly surprising.

They also mask the truth a little bit. The upcoming 700-Mhz auction has caused no end of controversy and divided the mobile community on some important issues, such as open access to networks. Bitter lawsuits are being flung back and forth between potential participants in this auction. This has created a lack of unified support for the open access measures and public safety rules.

Not only that, but other lawsuits abound. Qualcomm, Broadcom, Nokia, and others have locked horns over various patent issues, many of which have yet to be fully resolved.

So, the CTIA, the international association for the wireless telecommunications industry, presents a nice picture of the industry in its little survey. And I don't disagree that the industry has a lot to crow about. But there also are some serious tensions boiling just under the surface that could erupt into nasty, public battles that would cause this rosy picture to bare its thorns.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links