Commentary
Do You Use Vista Or Does It Use You, Continued
Open the pod bay door, HAL. There are stories from a couple of sources about Windows Update automatically updating and rebooting users' systems even when they thought they'd disabled automatic updates. And Microsoft hasn't said anything much about why.Open the pod bay door, HAL. There are stories from a couple of sources about Windows Update automatically updating and rebooting users' systems even when they thought they'd disabled automatic updates. And Microsoft hasn't said anything much about why.Scott Dunn writes in the "Windows Secrets" newsletter that "Microsoft updates Windows without users' consent." The updates in question affect Windows Update's own executables in both XP and Vista.
Mary Jo Foley, in her "All About Microsoft" blog on ZDNet, writes again today about a different problem: "The mystery continues: Why are Windows machines automatically updating themselves?"
More Insights
White Papers
- Creating the Enterprise-Class Tablet Environment - by Yankee Group
- How To Regain IT Control In An Increasingly Mobile World - by BlackBerry
Reports
More >>Webcasts
- Maximize ROI with Database Consolidation onto Private Clouds
- Outsourcing Security: What Every Potential Cloud Security Customer Should Know
The problem was first reported on AeroXperience. After last week's Patch Tuesday, Vista machines updated and rebooted themselves even though their nominal owners swear they were set to "Download updates but let me choose whether to install them."
Dunn found a kinda-sorta explanation from a Microsoftie on the Microsoft Communities boards. It seems, wrote "Dean-Dean," that the update was necessary so that Windows Update could find other updates: "Normal use of Windows Update, in other words, is blocked until this update is installed."
Foley reports that Microsoft is saying nothing about the Vista reboots, just asking for input from users who have experienced the problem.
The real question, of course, is how Microsoft's operating systems perform updates and reboots that are supposedly prohibited by their user's settings -- and why. There are good reasons for businesses and individuals to want to control changes to their OS installations. Microsoft needs to acknowledge them. Otherwise, we're left filling in the blanks with things like that classic exchange from 2001:
Dave Bowman: Hello, HAL. Do you read me, HAL? HAL: Affirmative, Dave, I read you. Dave Bowman: Open the pod bay door, HAL. HAL: I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that. Dave Bowman: What's the problem? HAL: I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do. Dave Bowman: What are you talking about, HAL? HAL: This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.
Related Reading
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. | |
|
|
T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting! |
Subscribe to RSSResource Links
This Week's Issue
Technology Whitepapers
- Creating the Enterprise-Class Tablet Environment - by Yankee Group
- How To Regain IT Control In An Increasingly Mobile World - by BlackBerry
- The BlackBerry PlayBook tablet's Good Bones - by BlackBerry
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
- New Visual and Wizard-Driven Paradigms for Exploring Data and Developing Analytic Workflows












