The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Digital Life

Topics:   Digital Life

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • |  Print this page Print this page
  • |   Bookmark and Share

Does This Punishment Fit the Copyright Crime?


Posted by Barbara Krasnoff, Oct 22, 2007 09:35 AM

While the RIAA goes after Usenet.com, a Vienna-based classical music publishing firm has succeeded in closing down a modest Web site which made public-domain musical scores available for free. Why? Because the site administrator wasn't an expert in international copyright law.

The International Music Score Library Project (IMSLP) was not what you would call your typical copyright violators. The site's maintainers made available scanned musical scores that were published at least 50 years after the composer's death -- which, according to Canadian law, puts the scores into the public domain. Unfortunately, in the United States and the European Union, the law extends copyright 70 years after the composer's death, and that extra 20 years has proved IMSLP's downfall. Austrian company Universal Edition sent a letter to the IMSLP demanding that the site pull all offending scores from the EU within two weeks and institute a filtering system to prevent further offenses.

The IMSLP wasn't a commercial venture like Usenet.com or even backed by a foundation like Project Gutenberg. It was a volunteer project by a bunch of music enthusiasts who thought it would be a good thing to make what they thought were public domain scores available to the public at large. So when they were faced with the possibility of fines and/or hefty legal fees, they took the only path available to them -- they closed down the site.

Was Universal Edition within its rights? Yes. Should countries expect their copyright laws to be respected elsewhere in the international community? Absolutely. Back in the 19th century, for example, British composers and writers like W. S. Gilbert and Arthur Sullivan had their works copied (sometimes in "improved" versions) and performed in the United States without receiving any royalties -- because at the time, U.S. law didn't recognize foreign copyrights.

Despite the logic of the situation, however, I can't help wishing that Universal Edition could have found a way to protect its copyrights without closing down a well-meaning and useful volunteer site. If, as Gilbert's Mikado sings, it could have "let the punishment fit the crime," the IMSLP's punishment would have been much lighter.

« Dumb iPhone Commercial Of The Week (Plus, Dell Discovers Devo) | Main | Comcast Is Blocking More Than BitTorrent, Including Lotus Notes »



Sign up now for the weekly InformationWeek Blog Newsletter.


This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.