Commentary

Paul McDougall
Editor At Large, InformationWeek  

Oracle Quiet As IRS Probes Quarter Billion Tax Write Off

The IRS is investigating whether Oracle used some accounting tricks to manufacture a quarter billion dollar loss and claim a $78 million refund. So far, Oracle won't talk--is it too busy trying to buy BEA?

The IRS is investigating whether Oracle used some accounting tricks to manufacture a quarter billion dollar loss and claim a $78 million refund. So far, Oracle won't talk--is it too busy trying to buy BEA?As first reported by InformationWeek on Monday, the tax agency is looking into whether the software maker improperly used the transfer of arcane assets known as promissory notes to a business partner to create a tax loss of more than $200,000,000 in 2003.

As a result of the loss, Oracle was able to collect a $78 million tax refund that year.


More Global CIO Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Sources say Oracle reported on its 2003 tax form that the loss was incurred because it was forced to sell stock in three companies it controlled at a price that was 24% less than face value.

Not so fast, the IRS says. Investigators doubt that a stock transfer actually took place and they've got a letter from a bank that helps prove it. The feds think the purported stock deals may have been nothing more than a tax shelter for a big corporation.

The stakes are high. When a public company has to revisit numbers of this size, earnings restatements sometimes follow. There's also the fact that, at a time when it's trying to consolidate half the software industry, Oracle might just want to have the government on its side.

Antitrust laws and all that.

For those reasons, I find it puzzling that Oracle won't explain its side of the story. I've called and e-mailed the company's PR folks several times--but, as Phil Collins once said--there's no reply at all.

Oracle, the government might want its $78 million back--so what's up with these stock deals?


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links