Commentary

Pete Spande
 

Web 2.0 Summit: Google Link Love Feeds Search And Online Fame

The Web 2.0 Summit hasn't really started and I've already made so many star sightings. If you build Web businesses, you know these people. These people are the "A-listers" of the Web 2.0 world. The notion of fame in the Web 2.0 world is top of mind, and a strong showing at the event will jump-start a new business, reinforce or create fame for the founders. There is even a session focused on "The Future of Web Fame."

The Web 2.0 Summit hasn't really started and I've already made so many star sightings. If you build Web businesses, you know these people. These people are the "A-listers" of the Web 2.0 world. The notion of fame in the Web 2.0 world is top of mind, and a strong showing at the event will jump-start a new business, reinforce or create fame for the founders. There is even a session focused on "The Future of Web Fame."Fame in this environment is no different than in the broader business space, or Hollywood, or the sporting ranks. With one big exception: fame feeds the business' success by providing "Google love." Online leaders give and get huge amounts of "Google love" that helps fuel that fame. It may not be discussed as much as the business deals, disruptive technologies, or other elements of the Web 2.0 world, but "Google love" is driving much of the business.

Underlying all of this popularity is Google's innovative approach to search. Google's big innovation to the field of online search was PageRank. For those unfamiliar with PageRank, here is Google's description:


More Internet Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

PageRank relies on the uniquely democratic nature of the Web by using its vast link structure as an indicator of an individual page's value. In essence, Google interprets a link from page A to page B as a vote, by page A, for page B. But, Google looks at considerably more than the sheer volume of votes, or links a page receives; for example, it also analyzes the page that casts the vote. Votes cast by pages that are themselves "important" weigh more heavily and help to make other pages "important." Using these and other factors, Google provides its views on pages' relative importance.

Of course, important pages mean nothing to you if they don't match your query. So, Google combines PageRank with sophisticated text-matching techniques to find pages that are both important and relevant to your search. Google goes far beyond the number of times a term appears on a page and examines dozens of aspects of the page's content (and the content of the pages linking to it) to determine if it's a good match for your query.

An online "A-lister's" popularity is sustained and reinforced by the sites that endorse their work via referrals (links) to their work. It works like this:

-- A popular person or program (Lonely Girl 15, for instance) is "discovered." -- People like the program and point to it on their Web sites. -- The increase in referrals to Lonely Girl increases the status of the programs in Google's search index. -- As the program gains prominence with the search index, it is discovered by more searchers. -- The increased awareness in search prompts more people to point to the program.

Wash, rinse, repeat.

The A-Listers are in demand. Pitches happen in every corner of the summit in hopes that an investment or at least a link will result. If a company pitches Michael Arrington at popular blog site TechCrunch and he likes what they have to say, he will mention and link to their site in his blog. When that happens, readers of TechCrunch also will go to the site and many will link to it as well. Google is therefore re-evaluating my site in its index based on the increase of referrals from these sites with strong PageRank.

Enough strong referrals and you're an A-Lister yourself.

It may not be the sexiest part of the summit, but the presentation of a new idea to the crowd gathered at the event today will inevitably pay off with "Google love." And a possibly an angel investor or two.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links