Commentary

What Is Google Talking To The Carriers About?

Late yesterday it came to light that Google is in talks with Verizon Wireless, Sprint and T-Mobile USA regarding its big mobile plans. Are they talking about the gPhone, or something else?

Late yesterday it came to light that Google is in talks with Verizon Wireless, Sprint and T-Mobile USA regarding its big mobile plans. Are they talking about the gPhone, or something else?According to the original Wall Street Journal article that broke the story, Google is talking to Sprint and Verizon about selling the carriers its yet-unannounced mobile platform, whatever that may be. It is not talking about selling them its own manufactured gPhone (c'mon, can we kill this rumor already?). It will leave the manufacturing up to Sprint and Verizon's handset partners. While that may be a disappointment to some, the idea of shopping a new mobile operating system is far more interesting.

Mobile platforms don't spring up overnight. They take time to research, develop and hone. If Google really is going to drop a new mobile operating system into the wireless telecommunications industry, it will have a far-reaching impact. Much more so than if it were to develop one handset.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

For Google to be shopping an OS and not hardware is the only thing that makes sense right now. Nearly all of its services and products are Web based, why would it suddenly start manufacturing consumer electronics? It knows better than to toe that line.

Instead, Google can license its platform to the carriers and existing OEMs. This will result in a wide range of handsets--rather than just one or two--that can use the OS, and in turn appeal to a wider range of people. I think the logic here is obvious.

Exactly what shape this new mobile platform will take, how it will work, what applications can be developed for it, and how advertising will parlay into the equation all add up to what will probably be the second-biggest mobile story of the year.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links