The InformationWeek -- Blogs

Over The Air

Topics:   Mobile

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Google Wants It All When It Comes To Wireless


Posted by Eric Zeman, Nov 30, 2007 12:18 PM

Google put months of speculation to rest today by officially announcing that it will bid in the FCC 700 MHz spectrum auction come January. It might eventually have its own mobile platform, offer all kinds of mobile services and have spectrum, but can Google feasibly run its own wireless network?


Google has been trying to move mountains of late, and so far it is succeeding. Over the summer it leaned on FCC Chairman Kevin Martin to attach all sorts of provisions to the upcoming spectrum auction. It didn't get all that it wanted, but Martin did eventually add some of the conditions Google sought, such as open access, to portions of the spectrum.

The open access idea has already had far-reaching consequences. Just this week Verizon Wireless altered its handset policies, and will activate non-Verizon phones on its network beginning later next year. It will also allow users to add their own applications to those devices, rather than be limited to the applications and services offered by Verizon. This is a huge change in policy for Verizon, which has hitherto retained tight control over the devices used on its network. Did Google force Verizon's hand here? Only Verizon can answer that.

Earlier this month Google announced its own mobile platform, Android. The platform will operate on as-yet unrealized hardware, and will be open for developers to create applications. It has signed up 30+ wireless players, including handset manufacturers, wireless network operators and software companies as part of the Open Handset Alliance. This is laudable, to be sure, but its success for Google and its partners is far from guaranteed.

Now it is planning to bid on wireless spectrum with which it could build a wireless network of its very own. Really, Google? To win the spectrum is going to take a minimum of $4.6 billion, and likely far more. That's just to get some licenses, people. Then Google will have to actually go out and invest in the infrastructure necessary to build a network. Each of the major wireless network operators has spent untold billions this year just to update and maintain their existing networks, let alone build them from scratch. For a software and services company to venture out into the real brick-and-mortar world of network infrastructure seems like a big risk.

Then there's the cost to run the network once it can be operated. If the network is eventually created, will Google then become a carrier? If so, it will have to develop a distribution model for handsets, forge different partnerships with OEMs and software writers and of course set up places for people to actually buy handsets. The list goes on and on and on and on. The capital and time investment here will be huge.

Despite how high Google's stock has surged this year, will its stockholders wait out this investment period patiently?

This move makes me recall a lesson I encountered while at business school. There was a period in Boeing's life when it was struggling. It bet the entire company on one new plane. If the plane succeeded, Boeing would live on. If not, Boeing would die. That plane was the 747, and became an instant hit. It saved Boeing's neck. But Boeing wouldn't have won if it hadn't stuck its neck out in the first place.

Google's neck doesn't need saving right now, but building a wireless network of its own represents a similar risk in my eyes. The question is, will the axe fall, or will Google succeed?

« Could Linux Help Bring Both Koreas Together? | Main | BlackBerry 9000 Details And Image Leaked »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
Mobile Video


Sign Up For The Over The Air Newsletter
Every Friday, our experts and analysts explore the business, strategy, and management issues most important to mobile and wireless technology.

Sign up for our free, weekly newsletter today!

Newsletter Archives


 

  1. Just Say No To SFAQL Parallelism
  2. QuickThread: A New C++ Multicore Library
  3. Speeding Up Code Without Doing Anything


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. Thoughts On The Motorola Droid
  2. Motorola Promises Fix For Droid's Goofy Camera
  3. Specs For Next Motorola Android Phone Leak
  4. Next-Gen BlackBerry Pearl Makes Appearance


  1. Review: Bluetooth Headsets For Mobile Pros
  2. Wolfe's Den: Intel CTO Envisions On-Chip Data Centers
  3. Practical Analysis: How Locked In To Vendors Are You?
  4. So Much Data, So Little Encryption
  5. Rolling Review: Acronis Deploys Windows 7 With Ease
  6. CIO Profiles: Mark Dajani, Senior VP And CIO Of Kraft Foods

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007