Commentary

Stephen Wellman
 

Is Google Planning An Android Platform For Wireless Spectrum?

According to a report in today's Wall Street Journal, Google looks like it's about to become a wireless service provider. Is this latest Google rumor just a repeat of the gPhone?

According to a report in today's Wall Street Journal, Google looks like it's about to become a wireless service provider. Is this latest Google rumor just a repeat of the gPhone?I think this rumor looks very similar to the rumors we kept hearing about the gPhone. Looking back on the gPhone hysteria through the lens of what we now know about Android, it's obvious why many people thought Google was building a phone. I imagine hundreds of Google outsiders saw random Googlers in Silicon Valley and beyond playing with Android applications. They speculated that these devices were proto-types for a new phone. And why not, it probably seemed the most logical explanation of what they saw.

Of course We now know these were just test-applications for a new OS, not a new phone.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

My colleague, Richard Martin, nailed the reasons why Google didn't build its own mobile phone.

It's also obvious that some insiders see Google planning to do something with spectrum. Google is making moves, plenty of which we have not seen, but others may have. What if all of Google's positioning around spectrum is a sign that Google wants to build a spectrum ecosystem rather than become a carrier? What if Google is building an Android platform equivalent for spectrum?

Such a move would fit into Google's existing mobile strategy -- create more open access, take power away from the carriers, and enable lots of new entrants. Earlier I speculated that Google might partner with Clearwire to help the upstart build a nationwide WiMax network. What if Google has several potential carrier upstarts in mind? Google could conceivable acquire all kinds of spectrum and then create a mechanism for leasing it to them. Thus, Google would create competition for the established carriers while leaving the dirty business of being a service provider to companies better positioned for it.

Either way, Google would win. If the effort works, great, Google has a controlling stake over new carriers and it has the means, i.e. spectrum, to make sure they don't close down their networks. If the effort flops, it will still put price pressure on the existing carriers as well as force them to play ball on Google's terms.

What do you think? Is Google planning to create its own ecosystem of new wireless carriers?


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links