Commentary

Michael Singer
 

Think Secret No More

Alas, poor Nick Ciarelli, I knew him Horatio. A fellow of Infinite Loop, a most excellent Apple fan boy. He hath borne me on his back a thousand times; and now how abhorred in my imagination it is! Still... good luck with that pile of cash from Apple, buddy.

Alas, poor Nick Ciarelli, I knew him Horatio. A fellow of Infinite Loop, a most excellent Apple fan boy. He hath borne me on his back a thousand times; and now how abhorred in my imagination it is! Still... good luck with that pile of cash from Apple, buddy.So Nick, whose eight-year run with Think Secret caused more than a few sleepless nights in Cupertino, is hanging up his blogging shoes to pursue his personal "One More Thing," eh? This should come as no surprise. He's spent the last two years battling Apple lawyers for leaking out certain types of information: You know... trade secrets. That kind of pressure has to take its toll. And even though there was no mention of a cash settlement, unless Apple is going to give Nick a 6-figure job, there should be no amount of iPhones and/or MacBook Pros that should keep him quiet.

Nick Ciarelli, or Mr. dePlume as I was first introduced to him, had a really good track record, the kind that made you think he was Johnny Ive leaking out information to create buzz or a Fake Steve Jobs, but with real insider knowledge. My personal favorite was Think Secret's prediction of the first ever iPod a week before its debut. The source called it a 'music-type' recorder/player, but not your average MP3 player. How right they were. At the time, there were several sites suggesting that the Oct. 23, 2001 "exciting product announcement" was going to be about a new Newton-like device. Ring one up for Think Secret.


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

AppleMatters had an interesting take on Nick back in October 2006. The site tracked and measured how accurate Think Secret was over a two-year period. According to the site, Nick had 11 correct predictions and 8 incorrect predictions... not bad. But it was his 11 missed announcements that amused the editors. And they were some dillys: Intel Inside, Boot Camp, AppleTV, a video iPod to name a few.

Some Apple pundits are now suggesting that Think Secret's settlement is a serious blow to bloggers. I disagree. Bloggers in general are gaining credibility in legal circles and Nick still has a firm legal leg to stand on. The Supreme Court has ruled that journalists can't be prohibited from publishing information that's lawfully obtained.

For anyone needing a daily dose of Mac news, there are still a multitude of prediction sites like Apple Insider, MacPredict.com, Xenomachina, Everything Apple, and Apple Unwired. Think Secret fans posting to the site's forum also point out that posts to Digg should still keep up the buzz meter as we approach Macworld 2008.

But after eight years, it might be a good thing for Nick to retire from Think Secret. Here's a man who claimed his site received an average of 2.5 million page views a month. After the lawsuit was filed, the number of page views jumped to 5 million.

If anything, Apple should be thanking people like Nick Ciarelli for keeping a constant lookout for Apple products. There aren't that many companies out there that have such a deep and dedicated fan base.

So we can Think Different. We can think for ourselves. But we can't Think Secret anymore. Good luck, Nick.

Feel free to chime in with your thoughts... What are you hoping to see at Macworld 2008?


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links