Commentary

We Need To Talk: End Users And IT Security

Another survey points to end users as the weakest of the weak links in the IT security chain. More evidence that security training is a must -- as in mandatory -- for all employees.

Another survey points to end users as the weakest of the weak links in the IT security chain. More evidence that security training is a must -- as in mandatory -- for all employees.RSA, the security division of EMC, published a report earlier this week provocatively titled, "The Confessions Survey: Office Workers Reveal Everyday Behavior That Places Sensitive Information At Risk." RSA had an interesting methodology to its survey: it conducted 126 "person-on-the-street" interviews of office and government workers in Boston and Washington, D.C. The results should send shivers up the spines of most CIOs.

>> 63% say they sometimes or frequently send corporate documents to a personal e-mail address in order to work on them at home.


More Global CIO Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

>> 52% say they sometimes or frequently access work-related e-mail via a public computer (i.e., a computer at an Internet cafe, airport kiosk, hotel, etc.).

>> 56% say they sometimes or frequently access work-related e-mail through a public wireless hotspot.

>> 65% say they sometimes or frequently leave work with a mobile device such as a laptop, smartphone, or USB flash drive that holds sensitive work-related information.

>> 8% admit to having lost a laptop, smartphone, or USB flash drive with corporate information on it.

Ouch!

While most CIOs readily agree that end-user security training is an important element in an overall security policy, few seem to feel that it is the MOST important element. That's according to InformationWeek's Information Security Survey 2007. In answer to the question, "How big an impact would security technology and policy training have on alleviating employee-based security breaches?," less than 20% of the 1,100 U.S. technology managers who participated in the survey think it would have a "significant impact." The majority, 63%, say it would have "some impact," and a surprising number, 18%, feel it would have "no impact."

An even more surprising result came in response to the question, "How often does your organization train employees on information security policies/procedures?" While more than a quarter (28%) say they train their employees in security yearly, the majority, 47%, say security training is "ad hoc," and 13% admit they never provide their employees with computer security training.

In the RSA survey, that number is even more dramatic: Almost a third (31%) of the office workers say their companies do not "provide training about the importance of following security best practices."

RSA is a computer security vendor, and it's looking to sell security products. That's fine, and more power to them. But even RSA points out that a realistic end-user security policy, strictly and proactively enforced, is a necessity in today's increasingly data-centric, data-sensitive world.

The findings of the survey underscore that the threat posed to data by well-meaning insiders -- employees, contractors, suppliers, partners, visitors, and consultants who have physical and/or logical access to organizational assets -- greatly broadens that posed by malicious insiders who deliberately leak sensitive data for personal financial gain or other criminal purposes.

Organizations can mitigate this risk by developing information-centric policies that acknowledge and align with the needs and realities of the business. Once such policies are in place, companies should constantly measure actual user behavior against established policy and use what they learn to inform smart policy changes that minimize risk and maximize business productivity. When security is as convenient as possible for end users, they are less likely to work around security policy."


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links