Commentary
Backup Appliance Replication -- Boon Or Boondoggle
Traditionally, your options for getting data off-site for disaster recovery were limited to shipping tapes or real-time data replication. Since tape shipping results in recovery point objectives (RPOs) and recovery time objectives (RTOs) of hours at best, and days in most cases, and real-time replication is expensive, there was a real lack of a middle ground. As de-duplicating backup appliances, including those from Sepaton, Quantum, Data Domain, and FalconStor (including OEMs from Copan to EMC and Sun) started to support the replication of de-duplicated data, that middle ground may be here.Traditionally, your options for getting data off-site for disaster recovery were limited to shipping tapes or real-time data replication. Since tape shipping results in recovery point objectives (RPOs) and recovery time objectives (RTOs) of hours at best, and days in most cases, and real-time replication is expensive, there was a real lack of a middle ground.
As de-duplicating backup appliances, including those from Sepaton, Quantum, Data Domain, and FalconStor (including OEMs from Copan to EMC and Sun) started to support the replication of de-duplicated data, that middle ground may be here.Since backup appliances, whether NAS or VTL, only have data to replicate after you run a backup, RPO is still limited to your backup frequency of once a day. If you set up real-time replication for your mission-critical applications, you'll size the link between your primary and DR sites to deal with middle of the day traffic levels.
More Storage Insights
White Papers
- Creating the Enterprise-Class Tablet Environment - by Yankee Group
- How To Regain IT Control In An Increasingly Mobile World - by BlackBerry
Reports
More >>Webcasts
- Maximize ROI with Database Consolidation onto Private Clouds
- The ABC's of Cloud Computing in the Midmarket
In the middle of the night when your backups run, and the appliances replicate, some of that bandwidth will be available. The data de-duplication that backup appliances apply, because it runs on files in their static state, does a much better job of sending just the changed portions of files than any host-based replication software.
So what do you think? Good idea or strange fever dream?
Related Reading
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. | |
|
|
T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting! |
Subscribe to RSSResource Links
This Week's Issue
Technology Whitepapers
- Mobile BI: Actionable Intelligence for the Agile Enterprise
- Creating the Enterprise-Class Tablet Environment - by Yankee Group
- How To Regain IT Control In An Increasingly Mobile World - by BlackBerry
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
- New Visual and Wizard-Driven Paradigms for Exploring Data and Developing Analytic Workflows
Featured Resource
Visit AMD's Business at the Speed of Virtualization Briefing Center, and discover all you need to know about virtualization. Click here for exclusive access to white papers,webcasts, videos, and more.
Read Now












