Commentary

George Hulme
 

Bank Failure Spawns New Regulations

Few may have noticed, but during the real-world summer stock slump Ginko Financial, a bank within Second Life, went bust. And ever since its failure, Second Life citizen complaints of interest-rate scams seem to have soared. "Since the collapse of Ginko Financial in August 2007, Linden Lab has received complaints about several in-world "banks" defaulting on their promises. These banks often promise unusually high rates of L$ return, reaching 20%, 40%, or even 60% annualized, reads a recent blog post from the virtual world operator, Linden Lab.

Few may have noticed, but during the real-world summer stock slump Ginko Financial, a bank within Second Life, went bust. And ever since its failure, Second Life citizen complaints of interest-rate scams seem to have soared. "Since the collapse of Ginko Financial in August 2007, Linden Lab has received complaints about several in-world "banks" defaulting on their promises. These banks often promise unusually high rates of L$ return, reaching 20%, 40%, or even 60% annualized, reads a recent blog post from the virtual world operator, Linden Lab.60% return? It's not easy to turn that down . . .

The result? Effective today, any business purporting to be a bank in Second Life must prove that it's also a legitimate banking institution in the real world. "As of Jan. 22, 2008, it will be prohibited to offer interest or any direct return on an investment (whether in L$ or other currency) from any object, such as an ATM, located in Second Life, without proof of an applicable government registration statement or financial institution charter," the post reads. "We're implementing this policy after reviewing Resident complaints, banking activities, and the law, and we're doing it to protect our Residents and the integrity of our economy."


More Security Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

One might expect there to be a backlash against the more stringent rules. Surprisingly, that's not the case. Many Second Lifers actually want to see an economy they can trust.

Here's what one Second Life citizen had to say, and reflects the opinion of many others who commented on the new policy. "While this may be a painful process initially, I think this is the right step in the long run. I personally lost the equivalent of a few hundred U.S. dollars from the Ginko failure, and while I expected part of that investment to be rather speculative, I didn't expect complete failure. The mismanagement of the Ginko system was criminal, in my opinion, and we need to squelch this activity."

Another commenter went so far as to suggest real-world regulators be brought in to help develop and enforce regulations to help a proper banking system prosper.

Not all see it this way. "I think LL [Linden Lab] is completely irresponsible in dealing with this. As usual, things get worse because LL fails to plan ahead. Honestly-run banks are going to get hurt by this, and in the end, honest investors and customers. LL needs to get their heads out of their posteriors and think before they act."

I couldn't disagree with the latter post more.

Good security, and enforceable (as well as fair and reasonable) rules that help to establish trust in the system, any system, whether the economy, the Internet, or even Second Life can only help it to flourish.

If fact, this type of step is actually necessary. This is especially so because the virtual Second Life economy is directly linked to the real-world economy: Linden dollars can be exchanged for U.S. dollars.

One can only expect to see more in-world "virtual" crime to increase as the virtual economy grows. So, Second Lifers, brace yourself for more scams, more attacks on account holders, and more rules as the popularity and power Second Life prospers.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links