Commentary

Stephen Wellman
 

Sprint Moves Ahead With WiMax Service. Will Anyone Pay For It?

Hillary Clinton wasn't the only one who had a comeback this week. After years of waiting, it looks like Sprint is finally ready to commercially launch its mobile WiMax service, Xohm, in April this year. Will Xohm flop or should I get ready to eat some crow?

Hillary Clinton wasn't the only one who had a comeback this week. After years of waiting, it looks like Sprint is finally ready to commercially launch its mobile WiMax service, Xohm, in April this year. Will Xohm flop or should I get ready to eat some crow?The Boy Genius Report claims that Sprint's WiMax service is impressively fast:


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

We got to play with an OQO 2 with embedded WiMAX. The unit is cosmetically identical to the existing retail version of the OQO 2, but it sports an integrated WiMAX radio instead of the current model's EV-DO chipset. The difference, from our entirely non-scientific tests, is remarkable, with super fast download speeds. Overall, we were very impressed.

Given Sprint's announcements this week at CES, the carrier seems to have gotten over its reluctance and is ready to move forward with commercial WiMax service. I guess after years of hype and a seemingly endless list of delays, it's about time. Now will anyone actually pay for it?

That will depend on two factors: Quality of service and price. Sprint is trying to control expectations about price, warning that while WiMax won't be expensive, it won't be cheap, either. I take that to mean that Xohm pricing could be comparable to existing 3G data plans, if not slightly higher.

If Xohm is comparable to existing 3G plans, but actually offers true broadband speeds, WiMax will have a chance.

As for the quality of Xohm's network, I think Sprint's lack of comment on QoS means it knows WiMax can live up the hype in terms of speed and network connections. If both of these factors are in place, WiMax could be this year's wireless comeback kid.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links