The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Virtualization Blog

Topics:   Virtualization

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

SunGard on Virtualization? 'Been Doing It For Years'


Posted by Joe Hernick, Jan 24, 2008 08:00 PM

I spoke with Don Norbeck out of Wayne, Pa., this morning. He's director of product development for SunGard Availability Services, though a more appropriate title might be SunGard Virtualization Guru. Or Evangelist.


Welcome to "part two of my soon to be a series" covering virtualization in large hosting centers. And yes, there might be a third.

Full disclosure -- in the bad old days I worked at a Fortune 100 that mirrored all critical systems (mainframe, Solaris, and x86) to SunGard's Thornton, Colo., center. They were a critical piece of my employer's disaster contingency planning.

SunGard has been relying on virtualization concepts as part of its disaster recovery offerings since day one. One way to look at it: Clients essentially lease a worst-case-driven mainframe "timeshare" as an insurance policy. Need a third contingency site for hosting your giant DB/2 environment? Sign on to SunGard in case you have a really bad day at your two primary sites. They'll spin you up.

SunGard's changed its product mix over the last 10 years, adding live hosting services to the tune of roughly one-third of its revenue on top of disaster recovery clients. Recent acquisitions of Inflow and VeriCenter were made to increase data center footprints, inherit talented warm bodies, and bring over additional clients. Its primary driver for acquisitions has been adding square footage, bringing its holdings to 27-plus hosting centers.

SunGard's take on virtualization? How 'bout "what's old is new again" -- Sun Containers, AIX, AS/400 have all been in-house forever. For the 23-year-olds out there, mainframes and midrange were "virtualized" long before VMware was a gleam in anyone's eye. SunGard dove into testing of ESX early last summer and began offering customer-facing VMware hosts in September. Norbeck was happy to say SunGard has achieved Gold VAC (VMware Authorized Consultant) status.

Norbeck sees x86 virtualization as the logical extension of a sound disaster recovery strategy. While most clients are seeking contingency ESX hosts for existing VMs, Norbeck says "P-to-V will be huge" in the near future as clients realize the savings and flexibility inherent in taking their in-house physical servers as a VM under SunGard's shared environment for disaster recovery planning.

While most hosting clients want their own iron, in disaster recovery situations a shared platform will do just fine, thank you. Bringing up my public transport analogy for shared hosting, Norbeck said customers will "call the bus if they need it. Or take a car share" to get to work. I guess folks aren't as picky about VM cooties when they need to get their business up and running.

While SunGard is leveraging experience with resource sharing, provisioning, and machine management, according to Norbeck the first lesson learned is that x86 platforms are not mainframes. Required downtime for upgrades/repairs, reboots for patches, and sharp performance plateaus add spice to the mix when SunGard entered ESX testing last summer.

Using SunGard as a barometer to measure large-company acceptance of open source or alternative hosting platforms doesn't bode well for the Xen and VZ vendors. Less than 1% of SunGard customers have inquired about non-VMware solutions, with an even smaller number of disaster recovery clients asking about 'alternate' virtualization host platforms. Everyone wants ESX.

SunGard brings in roughly $300 million on hosting revenue, which makes up about 30% of the company's annual take. It likes virtualization. It likes shared platforms. You should, too.

« Hey Joe, What Are You Doing With That Resume In Your Hand? | Main | FCoE Enigma Wrapped In A Riddle »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Visual Studio 2010 Multi-Monitor Support Helps Debugging Parallel Code
  2. Sequential Programming: Like Eating Peas with a Straw.
  3. Biomolecular device using self-assembled DNA nanostructures?


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. More Reasons Why Linux Misses The Desktop
  2. Too Much Netbook For Too Litl?
  3. Motorola Explains Why Droid Doesn't Have Multi-Touch
  4. Sprint And T-Mobile Headed The Wrong Direction


  1. Apple Releases Snow Leopard Security Patch
  2. 9 In 10 Web Apps Have Serious Flaws
  3. Agency For International Development Outsources To CSC
  4. Health IT Career Tips
  5. RIM, Adobe Team For BlackBerry Development
  6. Hadoop Crunches Web-Sized Data

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007