Commentary

Charles Babcock
InformationWeek  

Why Windows Predominates On Virtual Machines

We reported Jan. 2 that 96% of IT managers polled by Sage Research reported running Windows on their virtualized servers and 52% reported running Linux. Without a lot more information, exactly what that means can be debated, but I think it means Windows runs on a lot of physical servers.

We reported Jan. 2 that 96% of IT managers polled by Sage Research reported running Windows on their virtualized servers and 52% reported running Linux. Without a lot more information, exactly what that means can be debated, but I think it means Windows runs on a lot of physical servers.Sage Research is the technology practice of a Boston custom market analysis firm, Chadwick Martin Bailey. The poll, as reported in the Sage/CMB Pulse newsletter recently, was a relatively small one of 126 IT decision makers at companies with 1,000 or more employees.

Some readers have expressed skepticism that the results are skewed in Microsoft's favor and the story's conclusion, "Microsoft stands to gain from the marketplace's rush to virtualization," even though it's late getting its Hyper-V hypervisor to market, must be wrong.


More Windows Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

I don't think the results are skewed, but I can see where there's a good question about what they mean. The poll was a simple-minded one. What operating systems are you running on virtualized servers? If nearly everyone answers Windows, that's a reflection of how many Windows servers there are out there. Many of them are running a single application on a powerful x86 server, leaving lots of CPU cycles unused. That makes them a prime candidate to be consolidated onto a virtualized server.

But the main point is, no matter how much you read about Linux and the Macintosh, Windows servers are continuing to infiltrate the data center and line-of-business units at a rapid pace.

Different breakdowns of operating system market share are available, but consider this one from StackSafe, a company that produces software that examines the software stacks in IT operations and tests changes to them before they go into production. In a study of 400 IT sites, Windows Server (Windows Server 2000, 2003, and Windows NT) is the primary platform for newly deployed, multitier applications in 68% of the cases, "despite widespread attention to other alternatives."

There's no surprise to this. Data centers are rapidly evolving toward two server operating systems: Windows and Linux. Many partisans think every Linux installation is a victory vs. Microsoft, but it's long been my belief that Linux is replacing a Unix server more often than a Windows server. The only competitive factor at play, for those who don't want Microsoft to take over the whole world, is that the Unix server didn't become a Windows server.

At many IT shops, Windows skills outstrip Unix and Linux skills, although I think that picture is slowly changing. Nevertheless, if the world is rushing to virtualization, then many virtual machines will be running Windows, even though Linux lends itself to several advanced forms of virtualization on the server.

The wonder isn't that Linux was cited by only 52% of respondents but that it was cited by so many. In the StackSafe survey, Red Hat Linux, the operating system that came in second to Windows Server, showed up on "just over seven percent of servers." And that suggests that Linux is running more than its traditional share of the data center when those servers take the form of virtual machines.

But the Sage data doesn't go deep enough to answer the question in depth.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links